T Yamamura1, S Tsukikawa, K Yamada, S Yamaguchi. 1. Department of Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Toyoko Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan. t2yama@marianna-u.ac.jp
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Overexpression of VEGF and proliferation of microvessels are strongly related to liver metastases, however, morphologic analyses of microvessels in liver metastases have not been reported. The purpose of the present study was to examine the correlation between liver metastases and the diameters of microvessel lumens in the tumor tissue. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancers and 112 patients who underwent curative colorectal resection and survived without any recurrence were reviewed. Microvessel density (MVD) and the diameters of the lumens of individual microvessels were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in terms of the mean MVD of primary tumors between patients with liver metastases and those without liver metastases. The numbers of patients with liver metastases who had microvessels 100-200 microm in diameter and microvessels more than 200 microm in diameter were significantly greater than patients without liver metastases. Microvessels with lumens more than 100 microm in diameter were not detected in the liver metastatic lesion. CONCLUSION: Large microvessels in the primary tumor favor intravasation of cancer cells. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Overexpression of VEGF and proliferation of microvessels are strongly related to liver metastases, however, morphologic analyses of microvessels in liver metastases have not been reported. The purpose of the present study was to examine the correlation between liver metastases and the diameters of microvessel lumens in the tumor tissue. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancers and 112 patients who underwent curative colorectal resection and survived without any recurrence were reviewed. Microvessel density (MVD) and the diameters of the lumens of individual microvessels were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in terms of the mean MVD of primary tumors between patients with liver metastases and those without liver metastases. The numbers of patients with liver metastases who had microvessels 100-200 microm in diameter and microvessels more than 200 microm in diameter were significantly greater than patients without liver metastases. Microvessels with lumens more than 100 microm in diameter were not detected in the liver metastatic lesion. CONCLUSION: Large microvessels in the primary tumor favor intravasation of cancer cells. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.