Literature DB >> 11745493

Risk variables affecting high-grade Pap smears at second visit: effects of screening interval, year, age and low-grade smears.

K Sigurdsson1, S Adalsteinsson.   

Abstract

Our aim was to study the effect, during the period 1979-1996, of the potential risk factors (i) year, age at second visit and first screening interval on the frequency of detection of low- and high-grade smears at the second visit after a normal smear at the first visit; (ii) year, age at second visit and low-grade smears at first visit on the detection of high-grade smears at second visit; (iii) detection of low- and high-grade smears by calendar year at second visit after a normal first visit (period 1981-1996); (iv) proportion of high-grade smears at second visit attributable to low-grade smears at first visit (exposed group); and (v) effect of increasing the screening interval from 2 to 5 years. The results were as follows: (i) low-grade smears increased significantly with years, high-grade smears increased significantly with screening interval and both grades decreased significantly with age; (ii) high-grade smears increased significantly with low-grade smears at first visit and with year but decreased significantly with age; (iii) a significant increase in low-grade smears at second visit with years; (iv) 97% of high-grade smears at second visit were attributable to low-grade smears at first visit; and (v) the risk of high-grade smears was 60% higher when the screening interval was 5 years rather than 2 years after a normal visit at age 20. The strongest risk factors for high-grade cell changes were low-grade smears at first visit [odds ratio 10.2 (ii) and 29.0 (iv)] and first screening interval [odds ratio 1.6 (v)]. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745493     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  2 in total

1.  Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories.

Authors:  P Sasieni; J Adams; J Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Cervical HPV infection and neoplasia in a large population-based prospective study: the Manchester cohort.

Authors:  J Peto; C Gilham; J Deacon; C Taylor; C Evans; W Binns; M Haywood; N Elanko; D Coleman; R Yule; M Desai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.