Literature DB >> 11745293

A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables.

T Okabayashi1, J Yamamoto, T Kosuge, K Shimada, S Yamasaki, T Takayama, M Makuuchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic variables and the postoperative outcome in patients with mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) to identify important factors for predicting postresection prognosis. Although it has been reported that mass-forming ICC has a different etiology and biologic features compared with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), patients with ICC have been dealt with clinicopathologically in the same manner as patients with HCC.
METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent hepatectomy for mass-forming ICC with curative intent between 1981 and 1999 were studied. Fourteen preoperative clinical and diagnostic parameters and 12 postoperative surgicopathologic parameters were analyzed.
RESULTS: The rate of operative mortality in this patient cohort was 5%, and the overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 68%, 35%, and 29%, respectively, with a median survival of 19.6 months. A multivariate analysis revealed that independent negative prognostic factors were 1) hepatic regional lymph node metastasis, 2) multiple tumor presentation, 3) symptomatic tumor, and 4) the presence of vascular invasion. Using these factors, a new staging system was devised: Stage I disease was defined as a solitary tumor without vascular invasion, Stage II disease was defined as a solitary tumor with vascular invasion, Stage IIIA disease was defined as multiple tumors with or without vascular invasion, Stage IIIB disease was defined as any tumor with regional lymph node metastasis, and Stage IV disease was defined as any tumor with distant metastases. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 3-year survival rate and the median survival for each subgroup were 74% for patients with Stage I disease (median survival is the time when the cumulative survival rate of some patients' group declined to 50%; thus, the median survival could not be calculated in patients with Stage I disease because survival was 74% at the latest follow-up), 48% and 26.2 months for patients with Stage II disease, 18% and 16.8 months for patients with Stage IIIA disease, and 7% and 11.2 months for patients with Stage IIIB disease, respectively (P < 0.0001). None of the patients met the criteria for Stage IV disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results support the use of a new staging system for patients with ICC that is simple and predicts well the differences in survival after patients undergo hepatic resection. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745293     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011101)92:9<2374::aid-cncr1585>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  71 in total

1.  Primary liver cancer: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma emerges from the shadows.

Authors:  Susan Tsai; Hari Nathan; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-08

2.  Intrahepatic recurrence after surgery in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masakazu Yamamoto; Shun-ichi Ariizumi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Accomplishments in 2007 in the management of hepatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Anthony T C Chan; Yoji Kishi; Stephen L Chan; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05

5.  Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Xianwu Luo; Lei Yuan; Yi Wang; Ruiliang Ge; Yanfu Sun; Gongtian Wei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dario Ribero; Gennaro Nuzzo; Marco Amisano; Mariano Tomatis; Alfredo Guglielmi; Stefano Maria Giulini; Luca Aldrighetti; Fulvio Calise; Giorgio Enrico Gerunda; Antonio Daniele Pinna; Lorenzo Capussotti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  The prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in cholangiocarcinoma above the cystic duct: a new selection criterion for adjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Sameer H Patel; David A Kooby; Charles A Staley; Juan M Sarmiento; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takahiro Uenishi; Takatsugu Yamamoto; Shigekazu Takemura; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-15

9.  A simple and effective prognostic staging system based on clinicopathologic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Huabang Zhou; Xiaolan Jiang; Qiaomei Li; Jingyi Hu; Zhengrong Zhong; Hao Wang; Hui Wang; Bing Yang; Heping Hu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.166

10.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors after surgical resection.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Tommaso Campagnaro; Silvia Pachera; Alessandro Valdegamberi; Paola Nicoli; Alessandro Cappellani; Giulio Malfermoni; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.