Literature DB >> 11745191

The angiogenic "vascular endothelial growth factor/flk-1(KDR) receptor" pathway in patients with endometrial carcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications.

A Giatromanolaki1, E Sivridis, R Brekken, P E Thorpe, P Anastasiadis, K C Gatter, A L Harris, M I Koukourakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important endothelial cell mitogen associated with increased angiogenesis and aggressive tumor behavior. Its stimulating effect on endothelial cells basically is dependent on the presence of specific VEGF receptors, such as the flk-1(KDR) receptor. This study investigates the roles of VEGF and of a functionally intact angiogenic pathway, "VEGF/flk-1(KDR)," in patients with endometrial carcinoma and their significance in prognosis and therapy.
METHODS: A series of 121 endometrial carcinomas were studied. The expression of VEGF by endometrial tumor cells was assessed using the monoclonal antibody (MoAb) VG1. VEGF/KDR complexes on tumor endothelium or activated microvessel density (aMVD) were identified using the MoAb 11B5. In addition, the standard microvessel density (sMVD) was assessed with anti-CD31. In all tumors, the alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase technique was employed. A Fisher exact test or an unpaired, two-tailed t test was used for testing correlations between categoric tumor variables, whereas a log-rank test was used to determine statistical differences between life tables. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of tumor variables on overall survival.
RESULTS: Cytoplasmic VEGF expression in > 50% of tumor cells was associated significantly with aMVD (P < 0.0001) and with sMVD (P < 0.003). In univariate survival analysis, VEGF (P = 0.0002), aMVD (P = 0.001), and sMVD (P = 0.0009) were significant prognostic variables. Equally important were the histologic parameters tumor type (P = 0.03), tumor grade (P = 0.003), and disease stage (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, disease stage was the most important independent prognostic factor (P < 0.0001), followed by VEGF/KDR (P < 0.01), and VEGF (P < 0.04). Furthermore, VEGF and VEGF/KDR were the only independent prognostic variables for patients with Stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: sMVD and the angiogenic factor VEGF are important indicators of a poor prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. VEGF/KDR complexes define a subgroup of patients with endometrial carcinoma with an even worse prognosis. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745191     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011115)92:10<2569::aid-cncr1609>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  19 in total

1.  Role of inhibitor of DNA binding-1 protein is related to angiogenesis in the tumor advancement of uterine endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Min Khine Maw; Jiro Fujimoto; Teruhiko Tamaya
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  The CD44+/CD24- phenotype relates to 'triple-negative' state and unfavorable prognosis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Efthimios Sivridis; Aliki Fiska; Michael I Koukourakis
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  A phase II trial of thalidomide in patients with refractory endometrial cancer and correlation with angiogenesis biomarkers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; Michael W Sill; Doris Benbrook; Kathleen M Darcy; Deborah J Stearns-Kurosawa; Lynne Eaton; S Diane Yamada
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Differential expression of angiogenic factors in peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Authors:  Junji Wasa; Yoshihiro Nishida; Yoshitaka Suzuki; Satoshi Tsukushi; Yoji Shido; Kozo Hosono; Yoshie Shimoyama; Shigeo Nakamura; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 as a therapeutic target in endometrial cancer management.

Authors:  Laura M S Seeber; Ronald P Zweemer; René H M Verheijen; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-02-14

6.  Ulinastatin exerts synergistic effects with taxotere and inhibits invasion and metastasis of breast cancer by blocking angiogenesis and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Zhijun Sun; Xin Sun; Yonghua Zhang; Hong Wang; Biao Zhong; Jie Luo; Xiaoliang Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Endoglin, VEGF, and its receptors in predicting metastases in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sami K Saarelainen; Synnöve Staff; Nina Peltonen; Terho Lehtimäki; Jorma Isola; Paula M Kujala; Maarit H Vuento; Johanna U Mäenpää
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-14

8.  A phase II evaluation of aflibercept in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Robert L Coleman; Michael W Sill; Heather A Lankes; Amanda Nickles Fader; Neil J Finkler; James S Hoffman; Peter G Rose; Gregory P Sutton; Charles W Drescher; D Scott McMeekin; Wei Hu; Michael Deavers; Andrew K Godwin; R Katherine Alpaugh; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Overexpression of inhibitor of DNA-binding (ID)-1 protein related to angiogenesis in tumor advancement of ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Min Khine Maw; Jiro Fujimoto; Teruhiko Tamaya
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Intra-tumoural microvessel density in human solid tumours.

Authors:  J Hasan; R Byers; G C Jayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.