Literature DB >> 11745142

Mobility measurements of immunomagnetically labeled cells allow quantitation of secondary antibody binding amplification.

K E McCloskey1, K Comella, J J Chalmers, S Margel, M Zborowski.   

Abstract

Magnetic cell separation methods commonly utilize paramagnetic materials conjugated to antibodies that target specific cell surface molecules. The amount of magnetic material bound to a cell is directly proportional to the magnetophoretic mobility of that cell. A mathematical model has been developed which characterizes the fundamental parameters controlling the amount of magnetic material bound, and thus, the magnetophoretic mobility of an immunomagnetically labeled cell. In characterization of the paramagnetic labeling, one of the parameters of interest is the increase in magnetophoretic mobility due to the secondary antibody binding to multiple epitopes on the primary antibody, referred to as the "secondary antibody binding amplification," Psi. Secondary antibody-binding amplification has been investigated and quantitated by comparing the mobilities of lymphocytes directly labeled with anti-CD4 MACS (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) magnetic nanoparticle antibody with the mobilities of lymphocytes from the same sample labeled with two different indirect antibody-labeling schemes. Each indirect labeling scheme incorporated a primary mouse anti-CD4 FITC antibody that provides both FITC and mouse-specific binding sites for two different secondary antibody-magnetic nanoparticle conjugates: either anti-FITC MACS magnetic nanoparticle antibody or anti-mouse MACS magnetic nanoparticle antibody. The magnetophoretic mobilities of the immunomagnetically labeled cells were obtained using Cell Tracking Velocimetry (CTV). The results indicate that an average of 3.4 anti-FITC MACS magnetic nanoparticle antibodies bind to each primary CD4 FITC antibody, Psi(1,2f) = 3.4 +/- 0.33, and that approximately one, Psi(1,2m) = 0.98 +/- 0.081, anti-mouse MACS magnetic nanoparticle antibody binds to each primary mouse CD4 FITC antibody on a CD4 positive lymphocyte. These results have provided a better understanding of the antibody-binding mechanisms used in paramagnetic cell labeling for magnetic cell separation. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11745142     DOI: 10.1002/bit.10040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  9 in total

1.  Magnetically Responsive Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Smooth Muscle Cells Maintain Their Benefits to Augmenting Elastic Matrix Neoassembly.

Authors:  Ganesh Swaminathan; Balakrishnan Sivaraman; Lee Moore; Maciej Zborowski; Anand Ramamurthi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Application of magnetic particle tracking velocimetry to quadrupole magnetic sorting of porcine pancreatic islets.

Authors:  Venkata Sunil Kumar Sajja; Thomas R Hanley; Helen Gapsis; Byron Guernsey; David J Kennedy; Michael J Taylor; Klearchos K Papas; Paul W Todd
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Quantification of non-specific binding of magnetic micro- and nanoparticles using cell tracking velocimetry: Implication for magnetic cell separation and detection.

Authors:  J J Chalmers; Y Xiong; X Jin; M Shao; X Tong; S Farag; M Zborowski
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Cholesterol loading and ultrastable protein interactions determine the level of tumor marker required for optimal isolation of cancer cells.

Authors:  Jayati Jain; Gianluca Veggiani; Mark Howarth
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Isolation Methods for Human CD34 Subsets Using Fluorescent and Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting: an In Vivo Comparative Study.

Authors:  Himi Tripathi; Hsuan Peng; Renee Donahue; Lakshman Chelvarajan; Anuhya Gottipati; Bryana Levitan; Ahmed Al-Darraji; Erhe Gao; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Bradley J Berron
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Analysis of ryanodine receptor clusters in rat and human cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  Christian Soeller; David Crossman; Ray Gilbert; Mark B Cannell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Magnetic fingerprints of rolling cells for quantitative flow cytometry in whole blood.

Authors:  Mathias Reisbeck; Michael Johannes Helou; Lukas Richter; Barbara Kappes; Oliver Friedrich; Oliver Hayden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  The Fabrication and Application Mechanism of Microfluidic Systems for High Throughput Biomedical Screening: A Review.

Authors:  Kena Song; Guoqiang Li; Xiangyang Zu; Zhe Du; Liyu Liu; Zhigang Hu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Ultrasmall, Bright, and Photostable Fluorescent Core-Shell Aluminosilicate Nanoparticles for Live-Cell Optical Super-Resolution Microscopy.

Authors:  Jacob A Erstling; Joshua A Hinckley; Nirmalya Bag; Jessica Hersh; Grant B Feuer; Rachel Lee; Henry F Malarkey; Fei Yu; Kai Ma; Barbara A Baird; Ulrich B Wiesner
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 30.849

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.