Literature DB >> 11744860

Effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace in the treatment of single-curve idiopathic scoliosis.

Reuven Gepstein1, Yossi Leitner, Edna Zohar, Itzach Angel, Shai Shabat, Ilia Pekarsky, Tye Friesem, Yoram Folman, Amiram Katz, Brian Fredman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace when compared with the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO or Boston) brace in the treatment of single-curve adolescent-type idiopathic scoliosis. The Charleston and TLSO braces were applied for approximately 8 nighttime hours and 18 to 22 hours per day, respectively. Treatment success was defined as improvement of curve deterioration with <5 degrees progression from the start of brace therapy until the conclusion of treatment, as well as the absence for the need to perform corrective surgery. The success rates were determined by Risser stage, initial angle, type of curvature, and sex of the patient. In addition, the success rate of the Charleston brace was assessed by analyzing the degree of initial correction. One hundred twenty-two patients (94 girls, 28 boys) were studied. Eighty-five patients were treated with the Charleston brace and 37 with the TLSO brace. Mean Cobb angle of curvature before bracing was 30.4 degrees. The curvature was lumbar in 60 patients, thoracic in 56, and thoracolumbar in 6. The average follow-up time was 23 months, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Surgery was performed in 11.8% and 13.5% of patients in the Charleston and TLSO groups, respectively. In this patient population, no significant difference in success rate was found between the groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11744860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  20 in total

1.  Initial Cobb angle reduction velocity following bracing as a new predictor for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Saihu Mao; Benlong Shi; Leilei Xu; Zhiwei Wang; Alec Lik Hang Hung; Tsz Ping Lam; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Kwong Man Lee; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Evaluation of night-time bracing efficacy in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Ruffilli; Michele Fiore; Francesca Barile; Stefano Pasini; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-11-30

Review 3.  [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : Guideline for practical application].

Authors:  J Seifert; F Thielemann; P Bernstein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Evaluation of the efficiency of the Chêneau brace on scoliosis deformity : A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Timon Rabczuk; Mahsa Kavyani
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: indications for bracing and conservative treatments.

Authors:  André J Kaelin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

6.  Overweight is not predictive of bracing failure in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results from a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Sabrina Donzelli; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Brace management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jonathan R Schiller; Nikhil A Thakur; Craig P Eberson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  A history of bracing for idiopathic scoliosis in North America.

Authors:  Reginald S Fayssoux; Robert H Cho; Martin J Herman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Is night-time bracing still appropriate in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis?].

Authors:  J Seifert; A Selle
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Federico Canavese; André Kaelin
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.