Literature DB >> 11744427

CV-1 and MRC-5 mixed cells for simultaneous detection of herpes simplex viruses and varicella zoster virus in skin lesions.

Yung T Huang1, Scott Hite, Visar Duane, Huimin Yan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Culture for varicella zoster virus (VZV) is relatively insensitive. Herpes simplex viruses (HSV) culture methods, which rely on primary rabbit kidney (pRK), mink lung (Mv1Lu) or the ELVIS HSV culture system fail to detect VZV. Culture of atypical vesicular skin lesions should be able to detect both HSV and VZV.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity of a newly developed mixture of CV-1/MRC-5 cells for the concurrent detection of both HSV and VZV. STUDY
DESIGN: The CV-1/MRC-5 mixed cells were compared with pRK cells and Mv1Lu cells for the detection of HSV and to MRC-5 and A-549 cells for the detection of VZV. Fresh clinical samples submitted for HSV culture, VZV culture, and/or direct immunofluorescent assay (DFA) as well as frozen clinical samples previously positive for VZV were used for these comparisons.
RESULTS: This preliminary study suggest that CV-1/MRC-5 mixed cells are as sensitive as pRK and Mv1Lu cells for the detection of HSV and appear to be more sensitive than MRC-5 and A-549 cells for the detection of VZV. Although the sample size is small, pre-CPE staining with VZV specific monoclonal antibody (Mab) at day 2 post-inoculation may provide a rapid detection of VZV with these mixed cells, but not with MRC-5 or A549 cells. In addition, culture of VZV in mixed cells from fresh clinical specimens appears to be as sensitive as antigen detection by DFA. Finally, 1% of specimens from skin lesions submitted for HSV culture grew VZV, highlighting the importance of culturing for both VZV and HSV, particularly in the case of atypical lesions.
CONCLUSION: CV-1/MRC-5 mixed cells are highly sensitive for the simultaneous culture of HSV and VZV. The ability to detect either HSV or VZV from skin lesions is important for patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11744427     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(01)00230-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Should varicella-zoster virus culture be eliminated? A comparison of direct immunofluorescence antigen detection, culture, and PCR, with a historical review.

Authors:  D A Wilson; B Yen-Lieberman; S Schindler; K Asamoto; J D Schold; G W Procop
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Shalini Sharma; Sanjay Barua; Bhupendra N Tripathi; Barry T Rouse
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Microbiology laboratory and the management of mother-child varicella-zoster virus infection.

Authors:  Massimo De Paschale; Pierangelo Clerici
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2016-08-12

Review 5.  Laboratory diagnosis of viral infection.

Authors:  David R Peaper; Marie Louise Landry
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2014
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.