Literature DB >> 11743508

A comparison of the outcomes of neonates treated with two different natural surfactants.

R H Clark1, R L Auten, J Peabody.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether there exists a mortality difference between neonates treated with Infasurf (surfactant A [SA], ONY, Inc, Amherst, NY) and Survanta (surfactant B [SB], Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH).
METHODS: We evaluated 114 different neonatal units' records, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2000, of neonates < or = 36 weeks' estimated gestational age who were admitted for neonatal intensive care and reported to have been treated with SA or SB. We used stepwise logistic regression analysis to determine whether the type of surfactant was associated with increased incidence of neonatal death, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, or necrotizing enterocolitis independent of estimated gestational age, birth weight, sex, method of delivery, use of antenatal steroids, or place of birth.
RESULTS: We studied the records of 5169 neonates; 1115 (22%) received SA and 4054 (78%) received SB. The most important variables associated with neonatal death, intraventricular hemorrhage and necrotizing enterocolitis were birth weight and estimated gestational age. Logistic regression showed that the type of surfactant did not significantly influence any of these 3 outcomes. Neither overall mortality (8.3% vs 8.5%) or birth weight-specific mortality was different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: The differences in mortality previously reported are not present in a larger, more contemporary data set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11743508     DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.119624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

1.  More than a monolayer: relating lung surfactant structure and mechanics to composition.

Authors:  Coralie Alonso; Tim Alig; Joonsung Yoon; Frank Bringezu; Heidi Warriner; Joseph A Zasadzinski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Evolution of surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Smeeta Sardesai; Manoj Biniwale; Fiona Wertheimer; Arlene Garingo; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Complications among premature neonates treated with beractant and poractant alfa.

Authors:  Manizheh Mostafa Gharehbaghi; Seddigheh Hossein Pour Sakha; Mortaza Ghojazadeh; Farahnaz Firoozi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Comparison of three treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Georgios Baroutis; Joseph Kaleyias; Theodora Liarou; Eugenia Papathoma; Zoe Hatzistamatiou; Christos Costalos
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Delivery and performance of surfactant replacement therapies to treat pulmonary disorders.

Authors:  Nashwa El-Gendy; Anubhav Kaviratna; Cory Berkland; Prajnaparamita Dhar
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2013-08

6.  Mortality in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with poractant alfa, calfactant or beractant: a retrospective study.

Authors:  R Ramanathan; J J Bhatia; K Sekar; F R Ernst
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  The Impact of Nonequilibrium Conditions in Lung Surfactant: Structure and Composition Gradients in Multilamellar Films.

Authors:  Jenny Marie Andersson; Kevin Roger; Marcus Larsson; Emma Sparr
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 14.553

8.  Comparative evaluation of the effects of BLES and Survanta on treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns.

Authors:  Ali Aghayar Macooie; Zahra Fakour; Paria Roanaghi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.