Literature DB >> 11743373

Long-term outcome of autogenous rib graft nasal reconstruction.

J M Gurley1, T Pilgram, C A Perlyn, J L Marsh.   

Abstract

Whereas reconstruction of the hypoplastic nose with rib grafting is common, the long-term outcomes of nasal growth and aesthetics are unknown. This study assessed nasal morphometrics, patient satisfaction, and the perception of nasal appearance by others up to 15 years after nasal reconstruction using cantilevered autogenous chondro-osseous rib grafting with rigid internal fixation in children. Records of all patients who received nasal rib grafts between 1983 and 1998 by one senior surgeon were reviewed. Patients in this study were operated on before their late teens and had greater than 1-year follow-up including serial photographic documentation. Nasal growth was determined by comparing anthropometric measurements preoperatively, perioperatively, and postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was determined through a questionnaire that addressed memory, donor-site morbidity, and nasal perception. Independent, blinded skilled observers who reviewed frontal and lateral photographs of the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative intervals assessed nasal aesthetics. Thirty-two patients who underwent 38 rib graft reconstructions of the nasal dorsum and tip at an average age of 8.8 years constitute the study population. Six patients underwent secondary augmentation. The average interval between initial nasal reconstruction and evaluation for this study was 7.9 years. Comparative anthropometric measurements before and after surgery documented increases in both tip projection (2.3 percent) and nasal length (3.0 percent) and a decrease in nasolabial angle (1.9 percent). Patient satisfaction interview response rate was 100 percent of those whom we were able to contact (28 of 32). The average age at interview was 17.2 years. Most patients recalled the operation and denied recollection of pain. Donor-site long-term morbidity was not an issue for 86 percent of patients. Sixty-four percent of patients remembered their preoperative nasal appearance and 89 percent of these preferred the postoperative change and were not concerned with nasal scars or texture. Almost two-thirds of the patients had fixation screws removed from the nasal dorsum because of skin erosion, easy palpability, or visibility. Although several patients expressed a desire to make minor additional changes to their nose, only one of these elected offered presurgical consultation and none have had such surgery. The postoperative nasal appearance compared with that preoperatively was rated as improved for 66.3 percent of responses, 26.5 percent as unchanged, and 7.2 percent as deteriorated. Cantilevered autogenous chondro-osseous rib graft reconstruction of the nasal dorsum is an effective means of reconstruction for the hypoplastic nose in childhood with respect to morphometric measurements, patient self-perception, and the assessment of nasal appearance by others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11743373     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  An overview of nasal dorsal augmentation.

Authors:  Harley S Dresner; Peter A Hilger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Cortical tibial bone graft for nasal augmentation.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh Chauhan; Yadavalli Guruprasad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Precultivation of engineered human nasal cartilage enhances the mechanical properties relevant for use in facial reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Jian Farhadi; Ilario Fulco; Sylvie Miot; Dieter Wirz; Martin Haug; Sally C Dickinson; Anthony P Hollander; A U Daniels; Gerhard Pierer; Michael Heberer; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Techniques for correction of the nasal dorsum].

Authors:  W Heppt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Addition of decellularized extracellular matrix of porcine nasal cartilage improves cartilage regenerative capacities of PCL-based scaffolds in vitro.

Authors:  P S Wiggenhauser; S Schwarz; L Koerber; T K Hoffmann; N Rotter
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  The Use of Autologous and Cadaveric Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Nicole C Starr; J Zachary Porterfield; Christopher Harryman; Nikita Gupta
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques.

Authors:  Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

8.  Risks and complications in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Rettinger
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

9.  Structural grafts and suture techniques in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Holger G Gassner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

10.  Nose and Midface Augmentation by Rib Cartilage Grafts: Methods and Outcome in 32 Cases.

Authors:  Adham Farouk; Saad Ibrahiem
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2015-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.