PURPOSE: Thermal tissue ablation with radio frequency energy is an experimental treatment of renal tumor. We report early results of an ongoing trial of percutaneous radio frequency ablation for small renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with percutaneously accessible renal tumors were evaluated for radio frequency ablation. Tumors were solid on computerized tomography (CT), 3 cm. or less in diameter and enlarging during at least 1 year. Ablation was performed at the Interventional Radiology suite under ultrasound and/or CT guidance. A 50 W., 460 kHz. electrosurgical generator delivered radio frequency energy via a percutaneously placed 15 gauge coaxial probe. At least 2, 10 to 12-minute ablation cycles were applied to each lesion. Patients were observed overnight before discharge from hospital and reevaluated 2 months later. RESULTS: A total of 24 ablations were performed in 21 patients with renal tumor, including solid von Hippel-Lindau clear cell tumor in 19 and hereditary papillary renal cancer 2. Most (22 of 24) procedures were performed with patients under conscious sedation. At 2 months postoperatively mean tumor diameter plus or minus standard deviation decreased from 2.4 +/- 0.4 to 2.0 +/- 0.5 cm. (p = 0.001), and a majority of tumors (19 of 24, 79%) ceased to be enhanced on contrast CT. Mean serum creatinine plus or minus standard deviation was unchanged during this interval (1.0 +/- 0.2 mg./dl.). No major and 4 minor complications were encountered, including 2 episodes each of transient psoas pain and flank skin numbness. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous radio frequency ablation of small renal tumor is well tolerated and minimally invasive. It will remain experimental until procedural and imaging parameters that correlate with tumor destruction are validated.
PURPOSE: Thermal tissue ablation with radio frequency energy is an experimental treatment of renal tumor. We report early results of an ongoing trial of percutaneous radio frequency ablation for small renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with percutaneously accessible renal tumors were evaluated for radio frequency ablation. Tumors were solid on computerized tomography (CT), 3 cm. or less in diameter and enlarging during at least 1 year. Ablation was performed at the Interventional Radiology suite under ultrasound and/or CT guidance. A 50 W., 460 kHz. electrosurgical generator delivered radio frequency energy via a percutaneously placed 15 gauge coaxial probe. At least 2, 10 to 12-minute ablation cycles were applied to each lesion. Patients were observed overnight before discharge from hospital and reevaluated 2 months later. RESULTS: A total of 24 ablations were performed in 21 patients with renal tumor, including solid von Hippel-Lindau clear cell tumor in 19 and hereditary papillary renal cancer 2. Most (22 of 24) procedures were performed with patients under conscious sedation. At 2 months postoperatively mean tumor diameter plus or minus standard deviation decreased from 2.4 +/- 0.4 to 2.0 +/- 0.5 cm. (p = 0.001), and a majority of tumors (19 of 24, 79%) ceased to be enhanced on contrast CT. Mean serum creatinine plus or minus standard deviation was unchanged during this interval (1.0 +/- 0.2 mg./dl.). No major and 4 minor complications were encountered, including 2 episodes each of transient psoas pain and flank skin numbness. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous radio frequency ablation of small renal tumor is well tolerated and minimally invasive. It will remain experimental until procedural and imaging parameters that correlate with tumor destruction are validated.
Authors: T J Polascik; U Hamper; B R Lee; Y Dai; J Hilton; C A Magee; J K Crone; M J Shue; M Ferrell; V Trapanotto; M Adiletta; A W Partin Journal: Urology Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: I S Gill; A C Novick; A M Meraney; R N Chen; M G Hobart; G T Sung; J Hale; D K Schweizer; E M Remer Journal: Urology Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Amaka T Fadahunsi; Thomas Sanford; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Gennady Bratslavsky Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Brian J Fahey; Rendon C Nelson; Stephen J Hsu; David P Bradway; Douglas M Dumont; Gregg E Trahey Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Marc Friedman; Igor Mikityansky; Anthony Kam; Steven K Libutti; McClellan M Walther; Ziv Neeman; Julia K Locklin; Bradford J Wood Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: J J Hwang; M M Walther; S E Pautler; J A Coleman; J Hvizda; James Peterson; W M Linehan; B J Wood Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.450