Literature DB >> 11743215

Combination endocrine therapy in the management of breast cancer.

L B Michaud1, K L Jones, A U Buzdar.   

Abstract

Combination endocrine therapy has long been sought after as a means to better treat breast cancer. Agents that suppress estrogen production are given with agents that suppress estrogenic activity at the cellular level. Historically, these combinations have resulted in initial improvements in response rates, but relapse-free and overall survival were not significantly improved. Also, the increased toxicity seen with these regimens was limiting. New endocrine therapies with more potent activity and less toxicity have led to a resurgence of this idea in the management of breast cancer. Complete estrogen blockade has been compared with single-agent treatments in many different settings. The endocrine effects of this type of therapy are intriguing, but apparently do not readily predict a clinical advantage. The combination of an aromatase inhibitor and an antiestrogen, despite pharmacokinetic interactions, may prove to be beneficial. Results from ongoing trials are eagerly awaited to further address this question in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. For premenopausal breast cancer patients the options are more complex. Clinical outcomes with leutinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists plus aromatase inhibitors are limited to very small phase II studies and are not clearly superior to single-agent therapy. Clinical data in the metastatic setting with premenopausal patients favor the use of an LHRH agonist with tamoxifen over the use of an LHRH agonist alone. However, a similar comparison with tamoxifen alone is lacking with only one trial including this as a treatment arm. Adjuvant therapy with this combined endocrine approach (LHRH agonist plus antiestrogen) has been more extensively studied, but lacks crucial comparisons necessary for making complex treatment decisions. Hopefully, through investigative diligence and ingenuity this issue can be adequately understood. However, many exciting new agents are on the horizon that offer hope to further advance the progress made to date although further confounding the questions already answered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11743215     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-6-538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  5 in total

1.  Hormonal therapies in young breast cancer patients: when, what and for how long?

Authors:  Alexandre Christinat; Simona Di Lascio; Olivia Pagani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The combination of methylsulfonylmethane and tamoxifen inhibits the Jak2/STAT5b pathway and synergistically inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in ER-positive breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Nipin S P; Pramod Darvin; Young Beom Yoo; Youn Hee Joung; Dong Young Kang; Don Nam Kim; Tae Sook Hwang; Sang Yoon Kim; Wan Seop Kim; Hak Kyo Lee; Byung Wook Cho; Heui Soo Kim; Kyung Do Park; Jong Hwan Park; Soung Hoon Chang; Young Mok Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Current State of Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Arya Bhushan; Andrea Gonsalves; Jyothi U Menon
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  Efficacy of goserelin plus anastrozole in premenopausal women with advanced or recurrent breast cancer refractory to an LH-RH analogue with tamoxifen: results of the JMTO BC08-01 phase II trial.

Authors:  Reiki Nishimura; Keisei Anan; Yutaka Yamamoto; Kenji Higaki; Maki Tanaka; Kenji Shibuta; Yasuaki Sagara; Shinji Ohno; Shigeru Tsuyuki; Takahiro Mase; Satoshi Teramukai
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 5.  Recent Advances in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christy W S Tong; Mingxia Wu; William C S Cho; Kenneth K W To
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.