G C Sutton1, A Storer, K Rowe. 1. Nuffield Institute for Health, 71-5 Clarendon Rd, Leeds LS2 9PL, UK. graham.sutton@gw.wakeha.northy.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the cervical and breast screening coverage of south Asian women in Wakefield, compared with other city residents. DESIGN: Pairwise measurement of screening histories of women whose names appeared to be south Asian, and of non-Asian women matched by date of birth and general practice. DATA SOURCE: Computerised records of screening histories held by West Yorkshire Central Services Agency, for the eight general practices in central Wakefield. RESULTS: 67% of south Asians and 75% of non-Asians had acceptable (not overdue) cervical screening histories (chi(2)=13.75, p<0.001). 53% of south Asians and 78% of non-Asians had acceptable breast screening histories (chi(2)=8.5, p<0.01) CONCLUSION: Interventions should be designed to improve coverage for breast screening among south Asian women. The need for such interventions for cervical screening is equivocal.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the cervical and breast screening coverage of south Asian women in Wakefield, compared with other city residents. DESIGN: Pairwise measurement of screening histories of women whose names appeared to be south Asian, and of non-Asian women matched by date of birth and general practice. DATA SOURCE: Computerised records of screening histories held by West Yorkshire Central Services Agency, for the eight general practices in central Wakefield. RESULTS: 67% of south Asians and 75% of non-Asians had acceptable (not overdue) cervical screening histories (chi(2)=13.75, p<0.001). 53% of south Asians and 78% of non-Asians had acceptable breast screening histories (chi(2)=8.5, p<0.01) CONCLUSION: Interventions should be designed to improve coverage for breast screening among south Asian women. The need for such interventions for cervical screening is equivocal.
Authors: Christine Renshaw; Ruth H Jack; Steve Dixon; Henrik Møller; Elizabeth A Davies Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 3.295