Literature DB >> 11742910

Cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate administered via metered-dose inhaler plus babyhaler spacer in the treatment of asthma in preschool-aged children.

H Bisgaard1, M J Price, C Maden, N A Olsen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in children aged 12 to 47 months with asthma symptoms.
DESIGN: A retrospective economic analysis conducted from the perspective of the Danish health-care system, based on clinical data from a 12-week study.
SETTING: Thirty-three outpatient centers in nine countries. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-seven children aged 12 to 47 months with documented history of recurrent wheeze or asthma symptoms.
INTERVENTIONS: Two dosages of FP, 100 microg/d and 200 microg/d, and placebo administered in two divided doses via a metered-dose inhaler and a Babyhaler (Glaxo Wellcome; Middlesex, UK) spacer device. MEASUREMENTS: Effectiveness in terms of asthma exacerbations, control of cough and wheeze symptoms, symptom-free days, overall direct costs of asthma management in Danish kroner at 1999 prices, and mean and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
RESULTS: FP, 200 microg/d, was significantly more effective than placebo treatment in terms of the proportion of exacerbation-free patients (73.7% vs 59.8%; p = 0.025) and patients experiencing a > or = 25% improvement in cough symptoms (57.9% vs 39.0%; p = 0.018). The costs per exacerbation-free patient, per patient with a > or = 25% improvement in cough and wheeze symptoms from baseline, and per symptom-free day were lower in the FP groups than in the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for these end points indicated that the additional benefits of FP, 200 microg/d, were achieved at a lower overall cost compared with placebo treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the Danish health-care system, FP, 100 microg bid, administered via the Babyhaler inhalation device was cost-effective relative to standard therapy with bronchodilators alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11742910     DOI: 10.1378/chest.120.6.1835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  4 in total

Review 1.  Estimating drug costs in economic evaluations in Ireland and the UK: an analysis of practice and research recommendations.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes; Lesley Tilson; Michael Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of fluticasone versus montelukast in children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in the Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial.

Authors:  Li Wang; Christopher S Hollenbeak; David T Mauger; Robert S Zeiger; Ian M Paul; Christine A Sorkness; Robert F Lemanske; Fernando D Martinez; Robert C Strunk; Stanley J Szefler; Lynn M Taussig
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Asthma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez; Monica P Sossa-Briceño; Jose A Castro-Rodriguez
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A systematic review of economic evaluations of therapy in asthma.

Authors:  Katayoun Bahadori; Bradley S Quon; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Carlo Marra; J Mark Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2010-08-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.