Literature DB >> 11742644

The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section.

M J Osis1, K S Pádua, G A Duarte, T R Souza, A Faúndes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The opinions of Brazilian women regarding vaginal delivery and cesarean sections was studied.
METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-six women who had given birth in seven hospitals in São Paulo and Pernambuco, using the Public Health Service, were interviewed. The opinions of women who had delivered only by cesarean section was compared with those of women who had had at least one vaginal delivery.
RESULTS: Significantly more women who had experienced at least one vaginal delivery considered this to be the best way of giving birth (90.4% vs. 75.9% among C-section-only women). Similar proportions in both groups (45.5% and 42.8%) stated that vaginal labor is better because it causes less pain and suffering for the woman. Significantly more women who had experienced a vaginal labor (47.1% vs. 30.3%) reported that it had no disadvantage. More women who had only had cesarean sections referred not having contractions/pain as an advantage of this method (56.7% vs. 41.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, pain and women's perception of pain were the characteristics which differentiated women with history of vaginal delivery from those with cesarean sections in the sample studied. However, the opinion that vaginal delivery is better than cesarean section was expressed independently of the recognition that pain could be its main disadvantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11742644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  13 in total

1.  Reducing the rate of cesarean birth.

Authors:  Mary Lou Moore
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2002

2.  Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Michelle A Kealy; Rhonda E Small; Pranee Liamputtong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Preference of ghanaian women for vaginal or caesarean delivery postpartum.

Authors:  Ka Danso; Hm Schwandt; Ca Turpin; Jd Seffah; A Samba; Mj Hindin
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2009-03

4.  Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.

Authors:  Tatiane Watanabe; Roxana Knobel; Guilherme Suchard; Mario Julio Franco; Eleonora d'Orsi; Elenice Bertanha Consonni; Marcos Consonni
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

6.  Vaginal Delivery vs. Cesarean Section: A Focused Ethnographic Study of Women's Perceptions in The North of Iran.

Authors:  Maryam Zakerihamidi; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Effat Merghati Khoei
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2015-01

7.  Meta-analysis of the role of delivery mode in postpartum depression (Iran 1997-2011).

Authors:  Parvin Bahadoran; Hamid Reza Oreizi; Saeideh Safari
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-11-29

8.  Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy H Liu; Agustina Mazzoni; Nina Zamberlin; Mercedes Colomar; Olivia H Chang; Lila Arnaud; Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  An examination of women experiencing obstetric complications requiring emergency care: perceptions and sociocultural consequences of caesarean sections in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rasheda Khan; Lauren S Blum; Marzia Sultana; Sayeda Bilkis; Marge Koblinsky
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran.

Authors:  Parvin Rahnama; Khadigheh Mohammadi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.