OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of filler content and surface treatment on the wear of microfilled composites. METHODS: Four microfilled composites with different filler contents (A=20, B=25, C=30, and D=35 vol.%) were made with a light-cured resin (Bis-GMA/UDMA/TEGDMA). The surface treatment of the colloidal silica in each varied: F=functional silane, NF=non-functional silane, U=untreated. Silux Plus served as a control. Specimens were made in steel molds and cured in a light curing unit Triad II (40s/side). Abrasion and attrition wear were evaluated in vitro in a wear tester (OHSU oral wear simulator) with an abrasive slurry (poppy seeds + PMMA) and a human enamel antagonist. The average of five specimens was computed and compared using a ANOVA/Tukey's test at P < or = 0.05. The surface of the wear patterns and the distribution of filler particles were examined using a scanning electron microscope and digital imaging. RESULTS: As filler volume increased, wear was reduced regardless of filler treatment. Amounts of wear for specimens C and D were significantly lower than specimens A and B. Composites with functional silane treated microfiller (Group F) produced significantly less wear than those with non-functional microfiller (Group NF) at 30 and 35 vol.%, and less than the untreated microfiller (Group U) at 30 vol.%. Scanning electron microscopy of specimens of group NF showed large filler agglomerates (size > 1 microm) in the resin matrix, while specimens of group F and U showed fewer agglomerates. Digital imaging analysis revealed small filler clusters (size < or = 1 microm) in the resin matrix of all specimens. SIGNIFICANCE: Wear resistance of microfilled composites is enhanced by higher filler volumes irrespective of surface treatment, but good filler/matrix adhesion is needed to minimize wear.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of filler content and surface treatment on the wear of microfilled composites. METHODS: Four microfilled composites with different filler contents (A=20, B=25, C=30, and D=35 vol.%) were made with a light-cured resin (Bis-GMA/UDMA/TEGDMA). The surface treatment of the colloidal silica in each varied: F=functional silane, NF=non-functional silane, U=untreated. Silux Plus served as a control. Specimens were made in steel molds and cured in a light curing unit Triad II (40s/side). Abrasion and attrition wear were evaluated in vitro in a wear tester (OHSU oral wear simulator) with an abrasive slurry (poppy seeds + PMMA) and a human enamel antagonist. The average of five specimens was computed and compared using a ANOVA/Tukey's test at P < or = 0.05. The surface of the wear patterns and the distribution of filler particles were examined using a scanning electron microscope and digital imaging. RESULTS: As filler volume increased, wear was reduced regardless of filler treatment. Amounts of wear for specimens C and D were significantly lower than specimens A and B. Composites with functional silane treated microfiller (Group F) produced significantly less wear than those with non-functional microfiller (Group NF) at 30 and 35 vol.%, and less than the untreated microfiller (Group U) at 30 vol.%. Scanning electron microscopy of specimens of group NF showed large filler agglomerates (size > 1 microm) in the resin matrix, while specimens of group F and U showed fewer agglomerates. Digital imaging analysis revealed small filler clusters (size < or = 1 microm) in the resin matrix of all specimens. SIGNIFICANCE: Wear resistance of microfilled composites is enhanced by higher filler volumes irrespective of surface treatment, but good filler/matrix adhesion is needed to minimize wear.
Authors: Cecilia P Turssi; Juliana J Faraoni-Romano; Márcio de Menezes; Mônica C Serra Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Gerhard Gröger; Martin Rosentritt; Michael Behr; Josef Schröder; Gerhard Handel Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Michael D Weir; Jennifer L Moreau; Eric D Levine; Howard E Strassler; Laurence C Chow; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 5.304