Literature DB >> 11740913

Acetylcholinesterase blockade does not account for the adverse cardiovascular effects of the antitumor drug irinotecan: a preclinical study.

C Blandizzi1, B De Paolis, R Colucci, A Di Paolo, R Danesi, M Del Tacca.   

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanisms that account for the adverse cardiovascular effects of the antitumor drug irinotecan. The activities of irinotecan, its active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), and camptothecin were assayed in urethane-anesthetized rats to determine their effects on heart rate and blood pressure. In vitro experiments were performed to assess the effects of test drugs on acetylcholinesterase activity. Intravenous irinotecan (10 micromol/kg) decreased heart rate and blood pressure, but SN-38, camptothecin, or intracerebroventricular irinotecan had no effect. The bradycardic and hypotensive responses induced by irinotecan were abolished by bilateral vagotomy or atropine. Physostigmine caused a transient bradycardia, followed by a tachycardic response, and promoted a marked increment of blood pressure. Vagotomy or atropine prevented the bradycardic action of physostigmine, whereas the tachycardic and hypertensive responses were sensitive to atropine, but not to vagotomy. Five minutes after irinotecan administration (10 micromol/kg i.v.), its concentration in plasma and atrial tissue accounted for 2.29 +/- 0.19 micromol/L and 1.08 +/- 0.16 micromol/kg, respectively. The in vitro activity of human erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase was significantly inhibited by irinotecan (-21.5% at 100 microM) or physostigmine (-84.8% at 1 microM), whereas SN-38 or camptothecin had no effect. Rat atrial acetylcholinesterase was also significantly inhibited in vitro by irinotecan (-16.9% at 100 microM). The present results indicate that irinotecan exerts depressant effects on both heart rate and arterial blood pressure. A direct activation of cholinergic receptors or an interaction with central nervous sites does not appear to account for these inhibitory actions, whereas a blockade of acetylcholinesterase seems to occur at concentrations of irinotecan that may not be relevant in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11740913     DOI: 10.1006/taap.2001.9293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  4 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives on biologically active camptothecin derivatives.

Authors:  Ying-Qian Liu; Wen-Qun Li; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Keduo Qian; Liu Yang; Gao-Xiang Zhu; Xiao-Bing Wu; An-Liang Chen; Shao-Yong Zhang; Xiang Nan; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 12.944

2.  Compartmentalized accumulation of cAMP near complexes of multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) contributes to drug-induced diarrhea.

Authors:  Changsuk Moon; Weiqiang Zhang; Aixia Ren; Kavisha Arora; Chandrima Sinha; Sunitha Yarlagadda; Koryse Woodrooffe; John D Schuetz; Koteswara Rao Valasani; Hugo R de Jonge; Shiva Kumar Shanmukhappa; Mohamed Tarek M Shata; Randal K Buddington; Kaushik Parthasarathi; Anjaparavanda P Naren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  High-density real-time PCR-based in vivo toxicogenomic screen to predict organ-specific toxicity.

Authors:  Gabriella Fabian; Nora Farago; Liliana Z Feher; Lajos I Nagy; Sandor Kulin; Klara Kitajka; Tamas Bito; Vilmos Tubak; Robert L Katona; Laszlo Tiszlavicz; Laszlo G Puskas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Irinotecan-induced severe hypotension in a patient with lung cancer.

Authors:  Ryota Nakano; Kenji Momo; Airi Matsuzaki; Akiko Sakai; Takeshi Uchikura; Katsumi Tanaka; Satoshi Numazawa; Tadanori Sasaki
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.