Literature DB >> 11739723

Assembly of the RAG1/RAG2 synaptic complex.

Cynthia L Mundy1, Nadja Patenge, Adam G W Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger.   

Abstract

Assembly of antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination requires the site-specific recognition of two distinct DNA elements differing in the length of the spacer DNA that separates two conserved recognition motifs. Under appropriate conditions, V(D)J cleavage by the purified RAG1/RAG2 recombinase is similarly restricted. Double-strand breakage occurs only when these proteins are bound to a pair of complementary signals in a synaptic complex. We examine here the binding of the RAG proteins to signal sequences and find that the full complement of proteins required for synapsis of two signals and coupled cleavage can assemble on a single signal. This complex, composed of a dimer of RAG2 and at least a trimer of RAG1, remains inactive for double-strand break formation until a second complementary signal is provided. Thus, binding of the second signal activates the complex, possibly by inducing a conformational change. If synaptic complexes are formed similarly in vivo, one signal of a recombining pair may be the preferred site for RAG1/RAG2 assembly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11739723      PMCID: PMC134220          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.1.69-77.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  35 in total

1.  DNA sequence and structure requirements for cleavage of V(D)J recombination signal sequences.

Authors:  C A Cuomo; C L Mundy; M A Oettinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins establish the 12/23 rule in V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  D C van Gent; D A Ramsden; M Gellert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  DNA looping by Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group proteins NHP6A/B. Consequences for nucleoprotein complex assembly and chromatin condensation.

Authors:  T T Paull; R C Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-04-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Initiation of V(D)J recombination in a cell-free system.

Authors:  D C van Gent; J F McBlane; D A Ramsden; M J Sadofsky; J E Hesse; M Gellert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis.

Authors:  H Aldaz; E Schuster; T A Baker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-19       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase.

Authors:  H Savilahti; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-19       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Positional information within the Mu transposase tetramer: catalytic contributions of individual monomers.

Authors:  J Y Yang; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Similarities between initiation of V(D)J recombination and retroviral integration.

Authors:  D C van Gent; K Mizuuchi; M Gellert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Initiation of V(D)J recombination in vitro obeying the 12/23 rule.

Authors:  Q M Eastman; T M Leu; D G Schatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cleavage at a V(D)J recombination signal requires only RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and occurs in two steps.

Authors:  J F McBlane; D C van Gent; D A Ramsden; C Romeo; C A Cuomo; M Gellert; M A Oettinger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  42 in total

1.  The RAG1 N-terminal domain is an E3 ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Vyacheslav Yurchenko; Zhu Xue; Moshe Sadofsky
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The C-terminal portion of RAG2 protects against transposition in vitro.

Authors:  Sheryl K Elkin; Adam G Matthews; Marjorie A Oettinger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  DNA mismatches and GC-rich motifs target transposition by the RAG1/RAG2 transposase.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Tsai; Monalisa Chatterji; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer supports 12/23-regulated synapsis, cleavage, and transposition of V(D)J recombination signals.

Authors:  Patrick C Swanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Self-association and conformational properties of RAG1: implications for formation of the V(D)J recombinase.

Authors:  LeAnn J Godderz; Negar S Rahman; George M Risinger; Janeen L Arbuckle; Karla K Rodgers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Effect of CpG methylation on RAG1/RAG2 reactivity: implications of direct and indirect mechanisms for controlling V(D)J cleavage.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakase; Yousuke Takahama; Yoshiko Akamatsu
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Ordered assembly of the V(D)J synaptic complex ensures accurate recombination.

Authors:  Jessica M Jones; Martin Gellert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Evidence of a critical architectural function for the RAG proteins in end processing, protection, and joining in V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Tsai; Anna H Drejer; David G Schatz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  A high-throughput assay for Tn5 Tnp-induced DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Brandon Ason; William S Reznikoff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A non-sequence-specific DNA binding mode of RAG1 is inhibited by RAG2.

Authors:  Shuying Zhao; Lori M Gwyn; Pallabi De; Karla K Rodgers
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.