| Literature DB >> 11738688 |
A Melagrana1, R D'Agostino, V Tarantino, G Taborelli, M G Calevo.
Abstract
We compared the efficacy of bithermal (BAT) and monothermal cold (MCAT) and warm (MWAT) air caloric tests in identifying labyrinthine function anomalies in the child. At first, we established confidence intervals of normality for both monothermal tests in 40 children (22 males, 18 females) aged 6-14 years, clinically healthy and normal as previously shown by BAT. Subsequently, we compared the results of BAT with those of MCAT and MWAT performed in 46 children (22 males, 24 females) aged 6-14 years, affected by multiple labyrinthine diseases. These results confirmed that, as in the adult, MCAT alone should not be used in the evaluation of labyrinthine function in vertiginous patients. As to MWAT, we obtained good sensitivity and specificity with respect to BAT (83% and 90% for 90% probability; 78% and 92.5% for 95% probability). Sensitivity values increased or decreased depending on the disease causing vertiginous symptoms, with decreased or increased number of false negatives. In our opinion, MWAT cannot replace BAT for the study of labyrinthine function in children. MWAT alone can be used when vertigo is ascribable to vestibular neuritis or to endogenous disease (dysmetabolic, dyscrasic, dysendocrine).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11738688 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(01)00571-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0165-5876 Impact factor: 1.675