H Mawatari1, K Unei, S Nishimura, N Sakura, K Ueda. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. mawatari@triton.ocn.ne.jp
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The poor absorption of orally administered 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) causes a wide variation in its cytotoxic efficacy. An i.v. dosage form would eliminate this problem. Our objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics of 6MP administered orally with those of an i.v. dosage form 6-mercaptopurine riboside (6MPR), in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or malignant lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 10 children were treated with oral 6MP, 50 mg/m(2) per day, while five children were treated with 6MPR, 50 mg/m(2) per day, administered by rapid i.v. injection. The plasma concentrations of 6MP and of 6MPR were measured on day 0, while the concentrations of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) in red blood cells (RBC) were measured on day 2. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC1-5) was calculated from 1 to 5 h after drug administration. RESULTS: With the intravenously administered 6MPR, the AUC1-5 ranged from 124 to 186 (1.5-fold range, median 145) microM min; only two samples were obtained for the RBC concentration of 6TGN, and were 121 and 273 pmol per 25 mg hemoglobin. With the orally administered 6MP, the AUC1-5 ranged from 23 to 65 microM min (2.8-fold range, median 56); the RBC concentration of 6TGN ranged from 18 to 152 pmol per 25 mg hemoglobin (median 75). CONCLUSION: The i.v. administration of 6MPR showed less interindividual variation in the AUC1-5 coupled with a higher RBC level of 6TGN as compared with those by oral 6MP. We conclude that the i.v. administration of 6MPR achieves stable blood levels of active drug in children undergoing cancer chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: The poor absorption of orally administered 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) causes a wide variation in its cytotoxic efficacy. An i.v. dosage form would eliminate this problem. Our objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics of 6MP administered orally with those of an i.v. dosage form 6-mercaptopurine riboside (6MPR), in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or malignant lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 10 children were treated with oral 6MP, 50 mg/m(2) per day, while five children were treated with 6MPR, 50 mg/m(2) per day, administered by rapid i.v. injection. The plasma concentrations of 6MP and of 6MPR were measured on day 0, while the concentrations of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) in red blood cells (RBC) were measured on day 2. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC1-5) was calculated from 1 to 5 h after drug administration. RESULTS: With the intravenously administered 6MPR, the AUC1-5 ranged from 124 to 186 (1.5-fold range, median 145) microM min; only two samples were obtained for the RBC concentration of 6TGN, and were 121 and 273 pmol per 25 mg hemoglobin. With the orally administered 6MP, the AUC1-5 ranged from 23 to 65 microM min (2.8-fold range, median 56); the RBC concentration of 6TGN ranged from 18 to 152 pmol per 25 mg hemoglobin (median 75). CONCLUSION: The i.v. administration of 6MPR showed less interindividual variation in the AUC1-5 coupled with a higher RBC level of 6TGN as compared with those by oral 6MP. We conclude that the i.v. administration of 6MPR achieves stable blood levels of active drug in children undergoing cancer chemotherapy.
Authors: Ahmed F Hawwa; Paul S Collier; Jeff S Millership; Anthony McCarthy; Sid Dempsey; Carole Cairns; James C McElnay Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 4.335