Literature DB >> 11737634

The basis of asymmetry in IS2 transposition.

L A Lewis1, N Gadura, M Greene, R Saby, N D Grindley.   

Abstract

In the first step of IS2 transposition, the formation of an IS2 minicircle, the roles of the two IS ends differ. Terminal cleavage initiates exclusively at the right inverted repeat (IRR) - the donor end - whereas IRL is always the target. At the resulting minicircle junction, the two abutted ends are separated by a spacer of 1 or 2 basepairs. In this study, we have identified the determinants of donor and target function. The inability of IRL to act as a donor results largely from two sequence differences between IRL and IRR - an extra basepair between the conserved transposase binding sequences and the end of the element, and a change of the terminal dinucleotide from CA-3' to TA-3'. These two changes also impose a characteristic size on the minicircle junction spacer. The only sequences required for the efficient target function of IRL appear to be contained within the segment from position 11-42. Although IRR can function as a target, its shorter length and additional contacts with transposase (positions 1-7) result in minicircles with longer, and inappropriate, spacers. We propose a model for the synaptic complex in which the terminus of IRL makes different contacts with the transposase for the initial and final strand transfer steps. The sequence differences between IRR and IRL, and the behavioural characteristics of IRL that result from them, have probably been selected because they optimize expression of transposase from the minicircle junction promoter, Pjunc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11737634     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02662.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  9 in total

1.  Diversity of Tn4001 transposition products: the flanking IS256 elements can form tandem dimers and IS circles.

Authors:  M Prudhomme; C Turlan; J-P Claverys; M Chandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The left end of IS2: a compromise between transpositional activity and an essential promoter function that regulates the transposition pathway.

Authors:  Leslie A Lewis; Edruge Cylin; Ho Kyung Lee; Robert Saby; Wilson Wong; Nigel D F Grindley
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Characterization of a T5-like coliphage, SPC35, and differential development of resistance to SPC35 in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Minsik Kim; Sangryeol Ryu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Eukaryotic gene invasion by a bacterial mobile insertion sequence element IS2 during cloning into a plasmid vector.

Authors:  Alireza G Senejani; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-05-26

5.  Soluble expression, purification and characterization of the full length IS2 Transposase.

Authors:  Leslie A Lewis; Mekbib Astatke; Peter T Umekubo; Shaheen Alvi; Robert Saby; Jehan Afrose
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2011-10-27

6.  Protein-DNA interactions define the mechanistic aspects of circle formation and insertion reactions in IS2 transposition.

Authors:  Leslie A Lewis; Mekbib Astatke; Peter T Umekubo; Shaheen Alvi; Robert Saby; Jehan Afrose; Pedro H Oliveira; Gabriel A Monteiro; Duarte Mf Prazeres
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2012-01-26

7.  CDI/CDS system-encoding genes of Burkholderia thailandensis are located in a mobile genetic element that defines a new class of transposon.

Authors:  Angelica B Ocasio; Peggy A Cotter
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  How Do Transposable Elements Activate Expression of Transcriptionally Silent Antibiotic Resistance Genes?

Authors:  Aleksander Lipszyc; Magdalena Szuplewska; Dariusz Bartosik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Structures of ISCth4 transpososomes reveal the role of asymmetry in copy-out/paste-in DNA transposition.

Authors:  Dalibor Kosek; Alison B Hickman; Rodolfo Ghirlando; Susu He; Fred Dyda
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 11.598

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.