A A Weinbroum1, O Szold, D Ogorek, R Flaishon. 1. Post Anesthesia Care Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman St, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel. draviw@tasmc.health.gov.il
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Midazolam may occasionally precipitate hostility and violence instead of tranquility. We characterized these episodes, their rate of occurrence, the potential paradoxical responders and possible predisposing circumstances among patients undergoing lower body surgery under spinal or epidural anaesthesia and midazolam sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who fulfilled the study entry criteria and who underwent surgery within a 3-month period in a large metropolitan, university-affiliated hospital were enrolled. Sedation and restlessness in all patients were controlled by midazolam administered intravenously by the attending anaesthesiologist; these parameters were later objectively confirmed by recorded actigrams. If "paradoxical" events occurred, flumazenil 0.1 mg 10 s-1 was injected until the aberrant behaviour ceased. Patients with paradoxical reactions were later compared with matched control patients selected from the study group to identify epidemiological characteristics. RESULTS: The incidence of paradoxical events was 10.2% (six out of 58 patients, confidence limits 2.3-18.3%) and they occurred 45-210 min after sedation started; the only independent predictor was an age older than that of the entire study group. The mean cumulative and per weight doses of midazolam were similar for both the experimental and the study groups of patients: 7.3 +/- 2.8 to 10.1 +/- 3.6 mg, and 0.1 +/- 0.04 to 0.12 +/- 0.05 mg kg-1. Flumazenil 0.2-0.3 mg (range 0.1-0.5 mg) effectively stopped the midazolam-induced paradoxical activity within 30 s and surgery continued uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Flumazenil completely reverses midazolam-induced paradoxical reactions and they are more frequent in older patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Midazolam may occasionally precipitate hostility and violence instead of tranquility. We characterized these episodes, their rate of occurrence, the potential paradoxical responders and possible predisposing circumstances among patients undergoing lower body surgery under spinal or epidural anaesthesia and midazolam sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who fulfilled the study entry criteria and who underwent surgery within a 3-month period in a large metropolitan, university-affiliated hospital were enrolled. Sedation and restlessness in all patients were controlled by midazolam administered intravenously by the attending anaesthesiologist; these parameters were later objectively confirmed by recorded actigrams. If "paradoxical" events occurred, flumazenil 0.1 mg 10 s-1 was injected until the aberrant behaviour ceased. Patients with paradoxical reactions were later compared with matched control patients selected from the study group to identify epidemiological characteristics. RESULTS: The incidence of paradoxical events was 10.2% (six out of 58 patients, confidence limits 2.3-18.3%) and they occurred 45-210 min after sedation started; the only independent predictor was an age older than that of the entire study group. The mean cumulative and per weight doses of midazolam were similar for both the experimental and the study groups of patients: 7.3 +/- 2.8 to 10.1 +/- 3.6 mg, and 0.1 +/- 0.04 to 0.12 +/- 0.05 mg kg-1. Flumazenil 0.2-0.3 mg (range 0.1-0.5 mg) effectively stopped the midazolam-induced paradoxical activity within 30 s and surgery continued uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS:Flumazenil completely reverses midazolam-induced paradoxical reactions and they are more frequent in older patients.