Literature DB >> 11737125

Laser hair removal with alexandrite versus diode laser using four treatment sessions: 1-year results.

S Eremia1, C Li, N Newman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laser hair removal is the treatment of choice for hypertrichosis. The two most commonly used hair removal lasers are compared.
OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a comparative study examining the role of wavelength, fluence, spot size, pulse width, and cooling systems on long-term results after a series of four laser hair removal treatments using the 755 nm alexandrite and 800-810 nm diode lasers.
METHODS: The axillae of 15 untanned, type I-V patients were treated side by side four times at 4- to 6-week intervals with a 755 nm, 3-msec pulse width, cryogen spray-equipped alexandrite laser and an 800 nm, variable pulse width, cooled sapphire window-equipped diode laser. Each patient was pretested and treated with the maximum fluence tolerated at the largest spot size available for each laser (12 mm round/113 mm2 for the alexandrite and 9 mm for the diode).
RESULTS: Evaluations were done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the last treatment. Twelve-month results with the alexandrite and diode lasers achieved 85% versus 84% hair reduction. The fact that tan avoidance was strictly followed permitted the use of relatively high fluences (25-30+ J/cm(2)) even in type IV patients. For most patients, four treatment sessions using high fluences (30-40 J/cm(2)) with relatively large spot sizes (12 mm round for the 755 nm alexandrite and 9 mm for the 800 nm diode) resulted in 12-month hair reductions in the 90% range.
CONCLUSION: Both the alexandrite and diode lasers in this 12-month study produced excellent long-term hair reductions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11737125     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01073.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Photoepilation: state-of-the-art].

Authors:  R W Gansel
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Six-month follow-up multicenter prospective study of 368 patients, phototypes III to V, on epilation efficacy using an 810-nm diode laser at low fluence.

Authors:  Josefina Royo; Fernándo Urdiales; Javier Moreno; Marwan Al-Zarouni; Paloma Cornejo; Mario A Trelles
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs.

Authors:  Azin Ayatollahi; Aniseh Samadi; Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi; Somayeh Yadangi; Keyvan Nouri; Alireza Firooz
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Methods to Overcome Poor Response and Challenges of Facial Laser Hair Reduction.

Authors:  Anupriya Goel; Kritika Rai
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-06

5.  Meta-analysis of hair removal laser trials.

Authors:  Afshin Sadighha; Golnaz Mohaghegh Zahed
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Within-patient right-left blinded comparison of diode (810 nm) laser therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for hair removal.

Authors:  H Cameron; S H Ibbotson; R S Dawe; J Ferguson; H Moseley
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Comparison of Permanent Hair Removal Procedures before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Why We Should Consider Laser Hair Removal as a First-Line Treatment for Patients Who Meet Criteria.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Alexandra Terris Feldman; Patrick Chin; Michael Zaliznyak; Susan Rabizadeh; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.523

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.