Literature DB >> 11736953

Laboratory control of oral anticoagulant treatment by the INR system in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome and lupus anticoagulant. Results of a collaborative study involving nine commercial thromboplastins.

A Tripodi1, V Chantarangkul, M Clerici, B Negri, M Galli, P M Mannucci.   

Abstract

Because of the variable responsiveness of thromboplastins to lupus anticoagulants (LA), concerns have been raised about the validity of the prothrombin time-International Normalized Ratio (PT-INR) in monitoring oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and LA. To date, few studies have been performed, numbers of patients investigated are relatively small and results are conflicting. We report on a multicentre study organized to investigate further this clinically relevant issue. Each of nine thrombosis centres was asked to collect plasma samples from patients with APS who were on oral anticoagulants (cases) and patients without APS who were on oral anticoagulants (controls). Nine thromboplastins (three human recombinant, one from human placenta and five from rabbit brain) were calibrated at the co-ordinating centre according to World Health Organization guidelines. Measurements of the INR and factor X amidolytic activity for all frozen plasmas were performed centrally. The numbers of patients investigated were 58 cases and 57 controls. Between-reagent variability of the INR was higher in cases [coefficient of variation (CV) = 12.4%] than in controls (CV = 6.7%), but this was because of one of the thromboplastins only (Thromborel R, human recombinant), which measured considerably higher INR values than the others in cases but not in controls. In conclusion, our data indicate that LA interference on the PT-INR measured with the majority of commercial thromboplastins is not enough to cause concern if insensitive thromboplastins, properly calibrated to assign them an instrument-specific International Sensitivity Index are used. New thromboplastins, especially those made of relipidated tissue factor, should be checked for their responsiveness to LA before they are used to monitor oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with APS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11736953     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03178.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  16 in total

1.  Monitoring anticoagulation in patients with an unreliable prothrombin time/international normalized ratio: factor II versus chromogenic factor X testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Baumann Kreuziger; Yvonne H Datta; Andrew D Johnson; Nicole D Zantek; Ryan Shanley; Mark T Reding
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.276

2.  Differences in the INR evaluation of two different thromboplastins in patients with positivity to lupus anticoagulant in ongoing oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Paola Ferrazzi; Anna Colombo; Pierpaolo Di Micco; Corrado Lodigiani; Luca Librè; Lidia Luciana Rota; Alessandro Montanelli; Ilaria Quaglia
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2010-05-03

3.  Lupus anticoagulant, warfarin, and alternative laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation.

Authors:  Siva S Ketha; Rajiv K Pruthi; Robert D McBane; Waldemar E Wysokinski
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome.

Authors:  Elena Cucurull; Azzudin E. Gharavi; Yamini Menon; Wendell A. Wilson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2003-04

5.  Variability in the international normalised ratio (INR) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and positive lupus anticoagulant: should the INR targets be higher?

Authors:  Marielena Baquero-Salamanca; Angélica María Téllez-Arévalo; Carlos Calderon-Ospina
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-09

Review 6.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Are These Drugs an Effective and Safe Alternative to Warfarin? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Virginie Dufrost; Jessie Risse; Stéphane Zuily; Denis Wahl
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  [Diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome in anticoagulated patients].

Authors:  M Mohren; T Daikeler; A Engel; I Guenaydin; I Koetter
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Recurrent stent thrombosis in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome and dual anti-platelet therapy non-responsiveness.

Authors:  You-Hong Lee; Hyoung-Mo Yang; Seung-Jea Tahk; You-Sun Hong; Jin-Sun Park; Kyoung-Woo Seo; Yong-Woo Choi; Choong-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 9.  The antiphospholipid syndrome: what are we really measuring? How do we measure it? And how do we treat it?

Authors:  Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Treatment and monitoring of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and thrombotic history (Hughes syndrome).

Authors:  Maria J Cuadrado
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.