Literature DB >> 11735713

A comparison of dermatologists' and primary care physicians' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma: a systematic review.

S C Chen1, D M Bravata, E Weil, I Olkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of dermatologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in identifying pigmented lesions suggestive of melanoma and making the appropriate management decision to perform a biopsy or to refer the patient to a specialist. DATA SOURCES: Studies published between January 1966 and October 1999 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CancerLit databases; reference lists of identified studies; abstracts from recent conference proceedings; and direct contact with investigators. Medical subject headings included melanoma, diagnosis, screening, primary care, family practitioner, general practitioner, internal medicine, dermatologist, and skin specialist. Articles were restricted to those involving human subjects. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that presented sufficient data to determine the sensitivity and specificity of dermatologists' or PCPs' ability to correctly diagnose lesions suggestive of melanoma and to perform biopsies on or refer patients with such lesions. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently abstracted data regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the dermatologists and PCPs for diagnostic and biopsy or referral accuracy. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. The quality of the studies was also evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria; 10 were prospective studies. For diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity was 0.81 to 1.00 for dermatologists and 0.42 to 1.00 for PCPs. None of the studies reported specificity for dermatologists; one reported specificity for PCPs (0.98). For biopsy or referral accuracy, sensitivity ranged from 0.82 to 1.00 for dermatologists and 0.70 to 0.88 for PCPs; specificity, 0.70 to 0.89 for dermatologists and 0.70 to 0.87 for PCPs. Receiver operating characteristic curves for biopsy or referral ability were inconclusive.
CONCLUSIONS: The published data are inadequate to demonstrate differences in dermatologists' and PCPs' diagnostic and biopsy or referral accuracy of lesions suggestive of melanoma. We offer study design suggestions for future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735713     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.137.12.1627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  19 in total

1.  Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma: does the location of excision matter.

Authors:  Peter Murchie; Erika Sinclair; Amanda J Lee
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  To excise or not to excise? Should GPs remove possible melanomas?

Authors:  Sarah Purdy; David de Berker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma: primary care diagnostic technology update.

Authors:  Annette Plüddemann; Carl Heneghan; Matthew Thompson; Jane Wolstenholme; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Screening for Melanoma in Men: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Jamie A Jarmul; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Diagnosing and managing cutaneous pigmented lesions: primary care physicians versus dermatologists.

Authors:  Suephy C Chen; Michelle L Pennie; Paul Kolm; Erin M Warshaw; Eric L Weisberg; Katherine M Brown; Michael E Ming; William S Weintraub
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Assessment of the Diameter of Pigmented Skin Lesions With and Without a Ruler.

Authors:  Harshitha Mannam; Andrew Choi; Saya Jacob; Michael Kwa; Shuai Xu; June K Robinson
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zager; Steven N Hochwald; Suroosh S Marzban; Rony Francois; Kimberly M Law; Ashley H Davis; Jane L Messina; Vladimir Vincek; Christina Mitchell; Ann Church; Edward M Copeland; Vernon K Sondak; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Melanoma in primary care. The role of the general practitioner.

Authors:  D Buckley; C McMonagle
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Can we rely on a general practitioner's referral letter to a skin lesion clinic to prioritize appointments and does it make a difference to the patient's prognosis?

Authors:  Jill B Webb; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?

Authors:  Tony Watson; Fiona M Walter; Annabel Wood; Helen Morris; Per Hall; Simone Karner; Jon Emery
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2009-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.