Literature DB >> 11735647

A comparison of liposomal formulations of doxorubicin with drug administered in free form: changing toxicity profiles.

D N Waterhouse1, P G Tardi, L D Mayer, M B Bally.   

Abstract

The anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin has wide activity against a number of human neoplasms and is used extensively both as a single agent and in combination regimens. In addition to the use of free, unencapsulated doxorubicin, there are two US Food and Drug Administration approved liposomal formulations of doxorubicin currently available, with several additional liposomal formulations being researched either in the laboratory or in clinical trials. The two approved liposomal formulations of doxorubicin have significantly different lipid compositions and loading techniques, which lead to both unique pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles, distinct from those of the unencapsulated form. This article discusses the toxicities associated with the free form of doxorubicin, as well as those associated with the two most common liposomal formulations, namely Doxil and Myocet. One of the key toxicity issues linked to the use of free doxorubicin is that of both an acute and a chronic form of cardiomyopathy. This is circumvented by the use of liposomal formulations, as these systems tend to sequester the drug away from organs such as the heart, with greater accumulation in liver, spleen and tumours. However, as will be discussed, the liposomal formulations of doxorubicin are not without their own related toxicities, and, in the case of Doxil, may be associated with the unique toxicity of palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia. Overall, the use of liposomal doxorubicin allows for a greater lifetime cumulative dose of doxorubicin to be administered, however acute maximal tolerated doses differ significantly, with that of Myocet being essentially equivalent to free doxorubicin, while higher doses of Doxil may be safely administered. This review highlights the differences in both toxicity and pharmacokinetic properties between free doxorubicin and the different liposomal formulations, as have been determined in pre-clinical and clinical testing against a number of different human neoplasms. The need for further testing of the liposomal formulations prior to the replacement of free doxorubicin with liposomal doxorubicin in any established combination therapy regimens, as well as in combination with the newer therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735647     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200124120-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  50 in total

1.  Controlling liposome blood clearance by surface-grafted polymers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1998-06-08       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Liposomal doxorubicin.

Authors:  P G Tardi; N L Boman; P R Cullis
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.121

3.  Overexpression of Her-2/neu may be an indicator of poor prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Sadasivan; R Morgan; S Jennings; M Austenfeld; P Van Veldhuizen; R Stephens; M Noble
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Sterically stabilized liposomes: physical and biological properties.

Authors:  M C Woodle; M S Newman; J A Cohen
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.121

Review 5.  Anthracycline-derived chemotherapeutics in apoptosis and free radical cytotoxicity (Review).

Authors:  I Müller; D Niethammer; G Bruchelt
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.101

6.  Development of liposomal anthracyclines: from basics to clinical applications.

Authors:  A Gabizon; D Goren; R Cohen; Y Barenholz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin.

Authors:  B A Conley; M J Egorin; M Y Whitacre; D C Carter; E G Zuhowski; D A Van Echo
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Overexpression of HER-2/neu is associated with poor survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Berchuck; A Kamel; R Whitaker; B Kerns; G Olt; R Kinney; J T Soper; R Dodge; D L Clarke-Pearson; P Marks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: results of a randomized phase III clinical trial.

Authors:  D W Northfelt; B J Dezube; J A Thommes; B J Miller; M A Fischl; A Friedman-Kien; L D Kaplan; C Du Mond; R D Mamelok; D H Henry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Clinical efficacy and toxicity of standard dose adriamycin in hyperbilirubinaemic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: relation to liver tests and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  P J Johnson; N Dobbs; C Kalayci; M C Aldous; P Harper; E M Metivier; R Williams
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Role of red blood cells in pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Dirk Schrijvers
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Biological evaluation of pH-responsive polymer-caged nanobins for breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Richard W Ahn; Feng Chen; Angela J Fought; Thomas V O'Halloran; Vincent L Cryns; Sonbinh T Nguyen
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Polymer-caged nanobins for synergistic cisplatin-doxorubicin combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Thomas V O'Halloran; SonBinh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Complete regression of local cancer using temperature-sensitive liposomes combined with ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia.

Authors:  Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Chun-Yen Lai; Sarah M Tam; Lisa M Mahakian; Elizabeth S Ingham; Katherine D Watson; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Low-temperature 1H-NMR spectroscopic study of doxorubicin influence on the hydrated properties of nanosilica modified by DNA.

Authors:  V V Turov; V F Chehun; V N Barvinchenko; T V Krupskaya; Yu I Prylutskyy; P Scharff; U Ritter
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Watching the gorilla and questioning delivery dogma.

Authors:  Thomas J Anchordoquy; Dmitri Simberg
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Nanoparticulate STING agonists are potent lymph node-targeted vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Melissa C Hanson; Monica P Crespo; Wuhbet Abraham; Kelly D Moynihan; Gregory L Szeto; Stephanie H Chen; Mariane B Melo; Stefanie Mueller; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Polymersomes: a new multi-functional tool for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Dalia Hope Levine; P Peter Ghoroghchian; Jaclyn Freudenberg; Geng Zhang; Michael J Therien; Mark I Greene; Daniel A Hammer; Ramachandran Murali
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Nanoparticle uptake by circulating leukocytes: A major barrier to tumor delivery.

Authors:  Jamie L Betker; Dallas Jones; Christine R Childs; Karen M Helm; Kristina Terrell; Maria A Nagel; Thomas J Anchordoquy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Tumor-targeted hyaluronan nanoliposomes increase the antitumor activity of liposomal Doxorubicin in syngeneic and human xenograft mouse tumor models.

Authors:  Dan Peer; Rimona Margalit
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.