Literature DB >> 11735424

Electrostatic interactions between charged amino acid residues and the bacteriochlorophyll dimer in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

J C Williams1, A L Haffa, J L McCulley, N W Woodbury, J P Allen.   

Abstract

The extent of electrostatic contributions from the protein environment was assessed by the introduction of ionizable residues near the bacteriochlorophyll dimer in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Two mutations at symmetry-related sites, M199 Asn to Asp and L170 Asn to Asp, resulted in a 48 and 44 mV lowering of the midpoint potential, respectively, compared to the wild type at pH 8, while a 75 mV decrease in the midpoint potential was observed for the mutation L168 His to Glu. The decrease relative to wild type was found to be approximately additive, up to 147 mV, for various combinations of the mutations. As the pH was lowered from 9.5 to 6.0, the relative decrease in the midpoint potential became smaller for each of these three mutations. Titration of the pH dependence of the change in midpoint potential of the M199 Asn to Asp mutant compared to wild type yielded a pK(a) value of 7.9 and a change in midpoint potential from low to high pH of 59 mV. The major effect of the mutation on the midpoint potential of the dimer is interpreted as stemming from a negative charge on the residue. An average dielectric constant of approximately 20 was estimated for the local protein environment, consistent with a relatively hydrophobic environment for residue M199. The rate of charge recombination between the primary quinone acceptor and the bacteriochlorophyll dimer decreased in the M199 Asn to Asp mutant at high pH, reflecting the decrease in midpoint potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735424     DOI: 10.1021/bi011574z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  11 in total

1.  Structural, dynamic, and energetic aspects of long-range electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  Jan M Kriegl; G Ulrich Nienhaus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The evolutionary pathway from anoxygenic to oxygenic photosynthesis examined by comparison of the properties of photosystem II and bacterial reaction centers.

Authors:  J P Allen; J C Williams
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Trapping of a long-living charge separated state of photosynthetic reaction centers in proteoliposomes of negatively charged phospholipids.

Authors:  Angela Agostiano; Francesco Milano; Massimo Trotta
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Comparison of bacterial reaction centers and photosystem II.

Authors:  László Kálmán; JoAnn C Williams; James P Allen
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of mutation of carboxyl side-chain amino acids near the heme on the midpoint potentials and ligand binding constants of nitrophorin 2 and its NO, histamine, and imidazole complexes.

Authors:  Robert E Berry; Maxim N Shokhirev; Arthur Y W Ho; Fei Yang; Tatiana K Shokhireva; Hongjun Zhang; Andrzej Weichsel; William R Montfort; F Ann Walker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  The L(M196)H mutation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center results in new electrostatic interactions.

Authors:  Tatiana Y Fufina; Lyudmila G Vasilieva; Azat G Gabdulkhakov; Vladimir A Shuvalov
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  EPR, ENDOR, and special TRIPLE measurements of P(*+) in wild type and modified reaction centers from Rb. sphaeroides.

Authors:  J P Allen; J M Cordova; C C Jolley; T A Murray; J W Schneider; N W Woodbury; J C Williams; J Niklas; G Klihm; M Reus; W Lubitz
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Mutations to R. sphaeroides Reaction Center Perturb Energy Levels and Vibronic Coupling but Not Observed Energy Transfer Rates.

Authors:  Moira L Flanagan; Phillip D Long; Peter D Dahlberg; Brian S Rolczynski; Sara C Massey; Gregory S Engel
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 9.  Designing photosystem II: molecular engineering of photo-catalytic proteins.

Authors:  Brendon Conlan
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Engineering model proteins for Photosystem II function.

Authors:  Tom Wydrzynski; Warwick Hillier; Brendon Conlan
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.