Literature DB >> 11734877

Arthroscopic vs. open Bankart reconstruction: a comparison using expected value decision analysis.

S B Kailes1, J C Richmond.   

Abstract

The reporting of midterm failure rates following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for recurrent anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint has shown that the risk of failure may be higher with arthroscopic techniques than with traditional open methods. The use of expected value decision analysis offers an explicit, consistent, and structured means to assist the clinician in determining which stabilization technique to utilize. Decision analysis reveals that the surgical technique that is favored for a given patient depends on the value that the patient assigns to various potential outcomes following surgery, the perioperative morbidity of each of the two procedures, and the surgeon's probability of success with either technique

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11734877     DOI: 10.1007/s001670100210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  1 in total

1.  Fuctional outcome after open and arthroscopic bankart repair for traumatic shoulder instability.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; F Krummenauer; J Lübke; S Kirschner; K-P Günther; M Bottesi
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 2.175

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.