Literature DB >> 11733292

Provider adherence to a clinical practice guideline for acute asthma in a pediatric emergency department.

P V Scribano1, T Lerer, D Kennedy, M M Cloutier.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Critics of the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in an emergency department (ED) setting believe that they are too cumbersome and time-consuming, but to the best of the authors' knowledge, potential barriers to CPG adherence in the ED have not been prospectively evaluated.
OBJECTIVES: To measure provider adherence to an ED CPG based on National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) recommendations, and to determine factors associated with provider nonadherence.
METHODS: Prospective, cohort study of children aged 1-18 years with the diagnosis of an acute exacerbation of asthma who were seen in a pediatric ED and requiring admission, as well as a random selection of children discharged to home following pediatric ED care. The following adherence parameters were assessed: at least three nebulized albuterol treatments in the first hour; early steroid administration (after the first nebulizer treatment); clinical assessments using pulse oximetry and peak expiratory flow (PEF) (for children >6 years old); and use of a clinical score to assess acute illness severity (Asthma Severity Score). Nonadherence was defined as any deviation of the above parameters.
RESULTS: Between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 1999, 369 patients were studied. Of these, 38% (139) were discharged to home, 38% (140) were admitted to the observation unit, and 24% (90) were admitted to the inpatient unit. Illness severities at initial presentation to the ED were: 24% (86) had mild exacerbations, 59% (212) had moderate exacerbations, and 17% (62) had severe exacerbations. Sixty-eight percent (95% CI = 63% to 73%) of the patients were managed with complete adherence to the CPG. Of the 32% with some form of nonadherence, most (63%) were children older than 6 years; in this group 64% (48/75) were nonadherent due to lack of PEF assessment. When PEF assessment was disregarded, an 83% (95% CI = 79% to 87%) adherence to the CPG was achieved. Other nonadherence factors included: lack of at least three nebulized albuterol treatments provided timely within the first hour (5%); delay in steroid administration (6%); lack of pulse oximeter use (0.5%); and failure to record clinical score to assess severity (1.1%). Patient age, illness severity (acute and chronic), first episode of wheezing, and high ED volume periods (evenings and weekends) did not worsen adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice guidelines can be used successfully in the pediatric ED and provide a more efficient management and treatment approach to acute exacerbations of childhood asthma. With a systematic and concise CPG, barriers to adherence in a pediatric ED appear to be minimal, with the exception of using PEF in the routine ED assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11733292     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01131.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  19 in total

1.  Adherence to pediatric asthma guidelines in the emergency department: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour among health care professionals.

Authors:  Sanjit Bhogal; Jean Bourbeau; David McGillivray; Andrea Benedetti; Susan Bartlett; Francine Ducharme
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Development of an asthma management system in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Donald H Arnold; Thomas J Abramo; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  A tree-based decision model to support prediction of the severity of asthma exacerbations in children.

Authors:  Ken Farion; Wojtek Michalowski; Szymon Wilk; Dympna O'Sullivan; Stan Matwin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Effect of a clinical pathway on the hospitalisation rates of children with asthma: a prospective study.

Authors:  S P Norton; M V Pusic; F Taha; S Heathcote; B C Carleton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Multicenter analysis of quality indicators for children treated in the emergency department for asthma.

Authors:  Marion R Sills; Adit A Ginde; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Detecting asthma exacerbations in a pediatric emergency department using a Bayesian network.

Authors:  David L Sanders; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

7.  Increasing the use of anti-inflammatory agents for acute asthma in the emergency department: experience with an asthma care map.

Authors:  B H Rowe; A M Chahal; C H Spooner; S Blitz; A Senthilselvan; D Wilson; B R Holroyd; M Bullard
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.409

8.  An asthma management system in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas J Abramo; Donald H Arnold; Kevin B Johnson; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Kang-Hsien Fan; Neal Patel; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Implementation and evaluation of an integrated computerized asthma management system in a pediatric emergency department: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas J Abramo; Donald H Arnold; Kevin Johnson; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Kang-Hsien Fan; Neal Patel; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Childhood asthma hospitalizations in the United States, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Kohei Hasegawa; Yusuke Tsugawa; David F M Brown; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.