Literature DB >> 11732833

Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching.

J A Henry1, C L Flick, A Gilbert, R M Ellingson, S A Fausti.   

Abstract

Clinical assessment of the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus usually includes an attempt to match the pitch of tinnitus to a pure tone. A standardized clinical protocol for tinnitus pitch matching does not yet exist, and there is a history of unsuccessful attempts to obtain such measures reliably. The present study was designed to evaluate new protocols for identifying the perceived pitch of tinnitus, with the objectives of reducing testing time and improving test-retest reliability. Two protocols ("Octave" and "Binary") were developed, each of which was patterned after the testing procedure previously developed at the Oregon Tinnitus Clinic and used to assess thousands of tinnitus patients. Both protocols use computer-automation to conduct testing; the protocols differ according to their specific testing algorithms. Twenty subjects with nonfluctuating tinnitus were each tested over two sessions. Results of testing revealed that both protocols could obtain pitch matches within 20 to 25 min. Reliability of responses was good for some subjects but not others, and the Binary protocol generally provided more reliable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11732833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  5 in total

1.  The relationship between tinnitus pitch and hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Giriraj Singh Shekhawat; Grant D Searchfield; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A Bayesian perspective on tinnitus pitch matching.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Emily J Thielman; Krystyn Wypych; James A Henry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Impact of Spectral Notch Width on Neurophysiological Plasticity and Clinical Effectiveness of the Tailor-Made Notched Music Training.

Authors:  Robert Wunderlich; Pia Lau; Alwina Stein; Alva Engell; Andreas Wollbrink; Claudia Rudack; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.

Authors:  Charles-Édouard Basile; Philippe Fournier; Sean Hutchins; Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparing Tinnitus Tuning Curves and Psychoacoustic Tuning Curves.

Authors:  Philippe Fournier; Malgorzata Wrzosek; Michel Paolino; Fabien Paolino; Anne Quemar; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.