Literature DB >> 11732684

Serine proteinase inhibitors from eggs and larvae of tick Boophilus microplus: purification and biochemical characterization.

R Andreotti1, K C Malavazi-Piza, S D Sasaki, R J Torquato, A Gomes, A S Tanaka.   

Abstract

The present study describes the purification, characterization, and comparison of serine proteinase inhibitors during the development of egg and larva phases of the tick Boophilus microplus. Samples were collected of eggs between the first day of hatching and the beginning of eclosion (defined as El, E2, and E3) and of larvae between the first day of eclosion and the infectant phase (defined as L1, L2, and L3). Crude extracts of the samples (2.5% w/v in Tris-HCI buffer) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and showed three major protein bands of 42, 62, and 85 kDa, differing in intensity, from E1 to L3 samples. The total protein of the larva extracts was 34% less than that of the egg extracts, while no differences in active protein were detected. The apparent dissociation constant Ki determined for trypsin was 10-fold lower from E1 to L3 samples. Serine proteinase inhibitors from tick eggs and larvae (BmTls) were purified on trypsin-Sepharose column and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results showed a slight difference in protein pattern, with a protein band of 20 kDa in the E1 and E2 samples which did not appear in the other samples. The Ki for neutrophil elastase was 10-fold lower in L3 than E1. BmTI reverse-phase chromatography showed two and one major peaks in egg and larva samples, respectively. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the L3 main peak from a C8 column showed a mix of BmTIs with the major sequence AVDFDKGCVPTADPGPCKG. Changes indicated by molecular weight and inhibition activity suggest different roles for BmTIs during the development process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11732684     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012242817869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Protein Chem        ISSN: 0277-8033


  5 in total

Review 1.  Serpins in Tick Physiology and Tick-Host Interaction.

Authors:  Muhammad Nadeem Abbas; Adéla Chlastáková; Mohamed Amine Jmel; Evangelia Iliaki-Giannakoudaki; Jindřich Chmelař; Michail Kotsyfakis
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.073

2.  A thrombin inhibitor from the gut of Boophilus microplus ticks.

Authors:  Clarisse Gravina Ricci; Antônio Frederico Michel Pinto; Markus Berger; Carlos Termignoni
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Comparative microarray analysis of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus expression profiles of larvae pre-attachment and feeding adult female stages on Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle.

Authors:  Manuel Rodriguez-Valle; Ala Lew-Tabor; Cedric Gondro; Paula Moolhuijzen; Megan Vance; Felix D Guerrero; Matthew Bellgard; Wayne Jorgensen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 4.  Serine Protease Inhibitors in Ticks: An Overview of Their Role in Tick Biology and Tick-Borne Pathogen Transmission.

Authors:  Adrien A Blisnick; Thierry Foulon; Sarah I Bonnet
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Molecular characterization of the recombinant protein RmLTI-BmCG-LTB: Protective immunity against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

Authors:  Bárbara Guimarães Csordas; Rodrigo Casquero Cunha; Marcos Valério Garcia; Sérgio Silva da Silva; Fábio Leivas Leite; Renato Andreotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.