E Barbotte1, F Guillemin, N Chau. 1. Ecole de Santé Publique, Faculté de Médecine, Université Henri Poincare Nancy 1, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence rates of morbidity in the general population through bibliographic research. METHODS: Articles relating to impairment, disability, handicap, quality of life and their prevalence in the general population, published between January 1990 and March 1998, were selected on the MEDLINE database. FINDINGS: The 20 articles retained out of 433 used 41 different indicators. Indicators of impairment, disability, handicap and low quality of life showed prevalence rates of 0.1-92%, 3.6-66%, 0.6-56% and 1.8-26% respectively, depending on age and the accuracy of indicators. The heterogeneity of the conceptual framework and insufficient recognition of the importance of indicator accuracy, the age factor and the socioeconomic characteristics of the studied populations impede reliable international comparison. CONCLUSION: Further standardization of indicators is therefore required. The revision of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps may make it possible to resolve some of the difficulties encountered.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence rates of morbidity in the general population through bibliographic research. METHODS: Articles relating to impairment, disability, handicap, quality of life and their prevalence in the general population, published between January 1990 and March 1998, were selected on the MEDLINE database. FINDINGS: The 20 articles retained out of 433 used 41 different indicators. Indicators of impairment, disability, handicap and low quality of life showed prevalence rates of 0.1-92%, 3.6-66%, 0.6-56% and 1.8-26% respectively, depending on age and the accuracy of indicators. The heterogeneity of the conceptual framework and insufficient recognition of the importance of indicator accuracy, the age factor and the socioeconomic characteristics of the studied populations impede reliable international comparison. CONCLUSION: Further standardization of indicators is therefore required. The revision of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps may make it possible to resolve some of the difficulties encountered.
Authors: Daniel B Morris; Keith G Wilson; Jennifer J Clinch; Darcy J Ammerman; Dean Fergusson; Ian D Graham; Amy J Porath; Alia Offman; Isabelle Boland; James Watters; Paul C Hébert Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Katre Altmets; Allan Puur; Anneli Uusküla; Astrid Saava; Luule Sakkeus; Kalev Katus Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Ahmad R Hosseinpoor; Jennifer A Stewart Williams; Jeny Gautam; Aleksandra Posarac; Alana Officer; Emese Verdes; Nenad Kostanjsek; Somnath Chatterji Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 9.308