Literature DB >> 11731789

Production of calves from G1 fibroblasts.

P Kasinathan1, J G Knott, Z Wang, D J Jerry, J M Robl.   

Abstract

Since the landmark study of Wilmut et al. describing the birth of a cloned lamb derived from a somatic cell nucleus, there has been debate about the donor nucleus cell cycle stage required for somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT). Wilmut et al. suggested that induction of quiescence by serum starvation was critical in allowing donor somatic cells to support development of cloned embryos. In a subsequent report, Cibelli et al. proposed that G0 was unnecessary and that calves could be produced from actively dividing fibroblasts. Neither study conclusively documented the importance of donor cell cycle stage for development to term. Other laboratories have had success with NT in several species, and most have used a serum starvation treatment. Here we evaluate methods for producing G0 and G1 cell populations and compare development following NT. High confluence was more effective than serum starvation for arresting cells in G0. Pure G1 cell populations could be obtained using a "shake-off" procedure. No differences in in vitro development were observed between cells derived from the high-confluence treatment and from the "shake-off" treatment. However, when embryos from each treatment were transferred to 50 recipients, five calves were obtained from embryos derived from "shake-off" cells, whereas no embryos from confluent cells survived beyond 180 days of gestation. These results indicate that donor cell cycle stage is important for NT, particularly during late fetal development, and that actively dividing G1 cells support higher development rates than cells in G0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11731789     DOI: 10.1038/nbt1201-1176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  15 in total

Review 1.  Animal transgenesis: state of the art and applications.

Authors:  Eduardo O Melo; Aurea M O Canavessi; Mauricio M Franco; Rodolfo Rumpf
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Derivation and induction of the differentiation of animal ES cells as well as human pluripotent stem cells derived from fetal membrane.

Authors:  Shigeo Saito; Kazunari Yokoyama; Tomoharu Tamagawa; Isamu Ishiwata
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Generation of SV40-transformed rabbit tracheal-epithelial-cell-derived blastocyst by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  D de Semir; R Maurisse; F Du; J Xu; X Yang; B Illek; D C Gruenert
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 4.  Animal embryonic stem (ES) cells: self-renewal, pluripotency, transgenesis and nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Shigeo Saito; Bingbing Liu; Kazunari Yokoyama
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.174

5.  Viable transgenic goats derived from skin cells.

Authors:  Esmail Behboodi; Erdogan Memili; David T Melican; Margaret M Destrempes; Susan A Overton; Jennifer L Williams; Peter A Flanagan; Robin E Butler; Hetty Liem; Li How Chen; Harry M Meade; William G Gavin; Yann Echelard
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Cell fate transitions and the replication timing decision point.

Authors:  David M Gilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 7.  Factors affecting the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in Cattle.

Authors:  Satoshi Akagi; Kazutsugu Matsukawa; Seiya Takahashi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 8.  Nuclear transfer: progress and quandaries.

Authors:  Xuemei Li; Ziyi Li; Alice Jouneau; Qi Zhou; Jean-Paul Renard
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Cloning animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer--biological factors.

Authors:  X Cindy Tian; Chikara Kubota; Brian Enright; Xiangzhong Yang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Epigenetic modifications of embryonic stem cells: current trends and relevance in developing regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Henry Chung; Kuldip S Sidhu
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2008-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.