Literature DB >> 11731602

Disability matters in medical law.

K Diesfeld1.   

Abstract

The British Parliament stated that health services would be covered by the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (the act). However, when people with disabilities are at their most vulnerable, for example when in hospital or subject to medical procedures, the antidiscrimination law fails them. A review of cases indicates that when people with disabilities are subject to medical treatment, the legislative protections are allowed to vanish. Instead, medical decisions are justified on obscure notions such as "best interests", often with irreversible or even terminal results. This article examines the relevant provisions and limitations of the act, the features of notable non-treatment decisions, and the act's potential to guide future decision making. It argues that antidiscrimination legislation should be assertively applied to protect vulnerable people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11731602      PMCID: PMC1733479          DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.6.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Neither consenting nor protesting: an ethical analysis of a man with autism.

Authors:  K Diesfeld
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Bland: crossing the Rubicon?

Authors:  J M Finnis
Journal:  Law Q Rev       Date:  1993-07

3.  Health care, human worth and the limits of the particular.

Authors:  C Cherry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Best interests, public interest, and the power of the medical profession.

Authors:  John Coggon
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-07-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.