Literature DB >> 11731538

Effects of common excitatory and inhibitory inputs on motoneuron synchronization.

K S Türker1, R K Powers.   

Abstract

We compared the effects of common excitatory and inhibitory inputs on motoneuron synchronization by simulating synaptic inputs with injected current transients. We elicited repetitive discharge in hypoglossal motoneurons recorded in slices of rat brain stem using a combination of a suprathreshold injected current step with superimposed noise to mimic the synaptic drive likely to occur during physiological activation. The effects of common inputs to motoneurons were simulated by the addition of a waveform composed of from 6 to 300 trains of current transients designed to mimic excitatory and/or inhibitory synaptic currents. We compared the discharge records obtained in several trials in which the same "common input" waveform was applied repeatedly in the presence of different background noise waveforms. The effects of the common input on motoneuron discharge probability and discharge rate were determined by compiling a cross-correlation histogram (CCHist) and a perispike frequencygram (PSFreq) between the discharges of the same cell at different times. Both excitatory and inhibitory common inputs induced synchronous discharge that was evident by a large central peak in the CCHist. The CCHists produced by common excitatory inputs were characterized by larger and narrower central peaks than those generated by common inhibitory inputs. The PSFreqs produced by common excitatory inputs indicated an increase in the discharge rate of motoneurons around time 0 that coincided with the narrow and large central peak in the CCHist. On the other hand, inhibitory inputs often generated very little, if any, change in the discharge rate around time 0 corresponding with the small and wide central peak in the CCHist. These results suggest that the CCHist indicates the effective strength of the net common input but not its sign. Although correlated changes in discharge rate are often quite different for net excitatory and inhibitory common input, except in some restricted conditions, the PSFreq analysis also cannot be used to unambiguously distinguish net excitation from net inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11731538     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.6.2807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  Motor unit synchronisation is enhanced during slow lengthening contractions of a hand muscle.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Kurt W Kornatz; Devin V Dinenno; Shi Zhou; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Optimization of input patterns and neuronal properties to evoke motor neuron synchronization.

Authors:  Anna M Taylor; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Oscillations in endogenous inputs to neurons affect excitability and signal processing.

Authors:  Marjorie A Parkis; Jack L Feldman; Dean M Robinson; Gregory D Funk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The influence of perturbation duration and velocity on the long-latency response to stretch in the biceps muscle.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Eric J Perreault; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A simulation study to examine the effect of common motoneuron inputs on correlated patterns of motor unit discharge.

Authors:  Madeleine M Lowery; Zeynep Erim
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 6.  Historical reflections on the afterhyperpolarization--firing rate relation of vertebrate spinal neurons.

Authors:  E K Stauffer; J C McDonagh; T G Hornby; R M Reinking; D G Stuart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Diminished task-related adjustments of common inputs to hand muscle motor neurons in older adults.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Kurt W Kornatz; François G Meyer; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The monosynaptic Ia afferent pathway can largely explain the stretch duration effect of the long latency M2 response.

Authors:  Jasper Schuurmans; Erwin de Vlugt; Alfred C Schouten; Carel G M Meskers; Jurriaan H de Groot; Frans C T van der Helm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A study of synaptic connection between low threshold afferent fibres in common peroneal nerve and motoneurones in human tibialis anterior.

Authors:  Orawan Prasartwuth; Erdal Binboğa; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Common input to different regions of biceps brachii long head.

Authors:  Benjamin K Barry; Michael A Pascoe; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.