Literature DB >> 11731038

Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 1: cigarette design, testing approach, and review of results.

E L Carmines1.   

Abstract

A testing program was designed to evaluate the potential effects of 333 ingredients added to typical commercial blended test cigarettes on selected biological and chemical endpoints. Ingredients were incorporated into the test cigarettes as they are normally used in the manufacturing process. The studies performed included a bacterial mutagenicity screen (Ames assay), a mammalian cell cytotoxicity assay (neutral red uptake), determination of smoke chemical constituents, and a 90-day nose-only smoke inhalation study in rats. Three pairs of test cigarettes were produced, each containing one of three different groups of ingredients. In each pair, one of the cigarettes contained the normal approximate use level of the ingredients (low-level) and the other a 1.5-3 multiple of the normal use level (high-level). Analysis of the test cigarettes for selected ingredients or markers indicated that the target application rates were achieved and that the cigarettes had been manufactured as intended. Evaluation of cigarette performance indicated that the addition of the ingredients at high levels did not significantly alter the burning characteristics of the test cigarettes. Specific details of the individual studies conducted as part of an ingredient evaluation program are discussed in Parts 2-4 of this publication series (Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2002, 40, 93-104; Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2002, 40, 105-111; Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2002, 40, 113-131). The results of the smoke chemistry studies indicated a reduction in the majority of the smoke constituents and a few isolated instances of increases when compared to the control cigarettes. These smoke chemistry changes, while statistically significant, were not supported by any significant alteration in the biological effects of cigarette smoke normally seen with the bacterial mutagenicity assay, cytotoxicity assay or subchronic inhalation study. Based on the results of these studies, it can be concluded that these ingredients added to tobacco do not add significantly to the overall toxicity of cigarettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11731038     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00084-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Scientific assessment of the use of sugars as cigarette tobacco ingredients: a review of published and other publicly available studies.

Authors:  Ewald Roemer; Matthias K Schorp; Jean-Jacques Piadé; Jeffrey I Seeman; Donald E Leyden; Hans-Juergen Haussmann
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  The first total synthesis of (±)-4-methoxydecanoic acid: a novel antifungal fatty acid.

Authors:  Néstor M Carballeira; Carlos Miranda; Keykavous Parang
Journal:  Tetrahedron Lett       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.415

4.  Menthol cigarettes, race/ethnicity, and biomarkers of tobacco use in U.S. adults: the 1999-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Miranda R Jones; Benjamin J Apelberg; Maria Tellez-Plaza; Jonathan M Samet; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Menthol: putting the pieces together.

Authors:  Youn Ok Lee; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  The toxic effects of cigarette additives. Philip Morris' project mix reconsidered: an analysis of documents released through litigation.

Authors:  Marcia S Wertz; Thomas Kyriss; Suman Paranjape; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Evaluation of toxicity of aerosols from flavored e-liquids in Sprague-Dawley rats in a 90-day OECD inhalation study, complemented by transcriptomics analysis.

Authors:  Jenny Ho; Davide Sciuscio; Ulrike Kogel; Bjoern Titz; Patrice Leroy; Gregory Vuillaume; Marja Talikka; Elyette Martin; Pavel Pospisil; Stefan Lebrun; Wenhao Xia; Tom Lee; Yun Xuan Chng; Blaine W Phillips; Emilija Veljkovic; Emmanuel Guedj; Yang Xiang; Nikolai V Ivanov; Manuel C Peitsch; Julia Hoeng; Patrick Vanscheeuwijck
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Determination of rutin in cigarette tobacco, filters, mainstream smoke and burned ash of different branded cigarettes by high performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Yinshi Sun; Wei Li; Jianhua Wang; Jianjie Bi; Shudong Su
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Comparison of biological responses in rats under various cigarette smoke exposure conditions.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsuji; Hitoshi Fujimoto; Daiki Matsuura; Tomoki Nishino; K Monica Lee; Hiroyuki Yoshimura
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.628

10.  Heated tobacco products: the example of IQOS.

Authors:  Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.