Literature DB >> 11730741

Delaying the initiation of progesterone supplementation results in decreased pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: a randomized, prospective study.

S C Williams1, S Oehninger, W E Gibbons, W C Van Cleave, S J Muasher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare IVF outcome between two protocols for luteal phase supplementation, one beginning on day 3 after oocyte retrieval and the other beginning on day 6 after retrieval.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study.
SETTING: University-based assisted reproductive technology center. PATIENT(S): One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients undergoing IVF between January and July 2000. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to begin luteal phase support using vaginal progesterone beginning either on day 3 after oocyte retrieval or on day 6 after oocyte retrieval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rates and implantation rates. RESULT(S): All patients randomized underwent transfer. There were no differences in age, oocytes retrieved, or embryos transferred between the two groups. Those patients receiving luteal phase support with progesterone beginning on day 6 after retrieval had a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate per transfer compared with those beginning support on day 3 after retrieval (44.8% vs. 61.0%, respectively). This difference in pregnancy rates was greater in those patients undergoing a luteal gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation protocol (47.5% vs. 71.4%, day 6 vs. day 3, respectively). Beginning support on day 6 also significantly decreased implantation rates in the GnRH agonist group (21.0% vs. 34.0%, day 6 vs. day 3, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Pregnancy rates are significantly decreased by initiating luteal-phase progesterone supplementation on day 6 after oocyte retrieval during in vitro fertilization cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11730741     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02914-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

Review 1.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 3.  The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Ru Liu; Hua-Qiao Mu; Qi Shi; Xiao-Qiu Xiao; Hong-Bo Qi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles.

Authors:  H M Fatemi
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

5.  A 10-year follow-up on the practice of luteal phase support using worldwide web-based surveys.

Authors:  Gon Shoham; Milton Leong; Ariel Weissman
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Progesterone supplementation in natural cycles improves live birth rates after embryo transfer of frozen-thawed embryos-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Wånggren; M Dahlgren Granbom; S I Iliadis; J Gudmundsson; A Stavreus-Evers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

Review 7.  Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  Synchrony of the first division as an index of the blastocyst formation rate during embryonic development.

Authors:  Yamato Mizobe; Makoto Tokunaga; Naoto Oya; Reiko Iwakiri; Naomi Yoshida; Yumi Sato; Nanase Onoue; Yuji Ezono
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-18

9.  Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.

Authors:  Federica Di Guardo; Habib Midassi; Annalisa Racca; Herman Tournaye; Michel De Vos; Christophe Blockeel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Luteal phase support for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanglin Wu; Songying Zhang; Xiaona Lin; Shasha Wang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.211

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.