Literature DB >> 11730142

Solid waste digestors: process performance and practice for municipal solid waste digestion.

G Lissens1, P Vandevivere, L De Baere, E M Biey, W Verstrae.   

Abstract

The most common types of anaerobic digesters for solid wastes have been compared based on biological and technical performance and reliability. Batch systems have the most simple designs and are the least expensive solid waste digesters. They have high potential for application in developing countries. Two-stage systems are the most complex and most expensive systems. Their greatest advantage lies in the equalisation of the organic loading rate in the first stage, allowing a more constant feeding rate of the methanogenic second stage. Two-stage systems with biomass accumulation devices in the second stage display a larger resistance toward toxicants and inhibiting substances such as ammonia. However, the large majority of industrial applications use one-stage systems and these are evenly split between "dry" systems (wastes are digested as received) and "wet" systems (wastes are slurried to about 12% total solids). Regarding biological performance, this study compares the different digester systems in terms of organic loading rates and biogas yields considering differences in input waste composition. As a whole, "dry" designs have proven reliable due to their higher biomass concentration, controlled feeding and spatial niches. Moreover, from a technical viewpoint the "dry" systems are more robust and flexible than "wet' systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11730142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges of high-solid anaerobic digestion and possible measures for its effective applications: a review.

Authors:  Julius G Akinbomi; Regina J Patinvoh; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Impact of temperature, inoculum flow pattern, inoculum type, and their ratio on dry anaerobic digestion for biogas production.

Authors:  Md Shahadat Hossain; Tahmid Ul Karim; Mahade Hassan Onik; Deepak Kumar; Md Anisur Rahman; Abu Yousuf; Mohammad Rakib Uddin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Biogas production from citrus waste by membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Rachma Wikandari; Ria Millati; Muhammad Nur Cahyanto; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.