A S Neubauer1, S Priglinger, O Ehrt. 1. Augenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336 München. Aljoscha.Neubauer@ak-i.med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the costs and benefits of electronic, paperless patient records with the conventional paper-based charts. METHODS: Costs and benefits of planned electronic patient records are calculated for a University eye hospital with 140 beds. Benefit is determined by direct costs saved by electronic records. RESULTS: In the example shown, the additional benefits of electronic patient records, as far as they can be quantified total 192,000 DM per year. The costs of the necessary investments are 234,000 DM per year when using a linear depreciation over 4 years. In total, there are additional annual costs for electronic patient records of 42,000 DM. Different scenarios were analyzed. By increasing the time of depreciation to 6 years, the cost deficit reduces to only approximately 9,000 DM. Increased wages reduce the deficit further while the deficit increases with a loss of functions of the electronic patient record. However, several benefits of electronic records regarding research, teaching, quality control and better data access cannot be easily quantified and would greatly increase the benefit to cost ratio. CONCLUSION: Only part of the advantages of electronic patient records can easily be quantified in terms of directly saved costs. The small cost deficit calculated in this example is overcompensated by several benefits, which can only be enumerated qualitatively due to problems in quantification.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the costs and benefits of electronic, paperless patient records with the conventional paper-based charts. METHODS: Costs and benefits of planned electronic patient records are calculated for a University eye hospital with 140 beds. Benefit is determined by direct costs saved by electronic records. RESULTS: In the example shown, the additional benefits of electronic patient records, as far as they can be quantified total 192,000 DM per year. The costs of the necessary investments are 234,000 DM per year when using a linear depreciation over 4 years. In total, there are additional annual costs for electronic patient records of 42,000 DM. Different scenarios were analyzed. By increasing the time of depreciation to 6 years, the cost deficit reduces to only approximately 9,000 DM. Increased wages reduce the deficit further while the deficit increases with a loss of functions of the electronic patient record. However, several benefits of electronic records regarding research, teaching, quality control and better data access cannot be easily quantified and would greatly increase the benefit to cost ratio. CONCLUSION: Only part of the advantages of electronic patient records can easily be quantified in terms of directly saved costs. The small cost deficit calculated in this example is overcompensated by several benefits, which can only be enumerated qualitatively due to problems in quantification.
Authors: C Spira-Eppig; T Eppig; M Bischof; G Schießl; G Milioti; B Käsmann-Kellner; H Carstensen; B Schick; B Seitz Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.059