OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to detect recurrent disease in the follow-up of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) who have negative diagnostic (131)I scans and abnormal thyroglobulin levels. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In general, patients with WDTC have an excellent long-term prognosis when appropriate surgical treatment and follow-up are carried out. After total thyroid ablation, whole-body (131)I scintigraphy and measurement of serum thyroglobulin are useful diagnostic tools to detect persistent or recurrent malignancy. In case of tumor dedifferentiation, decreased or lost iodine-accumulating ability may lead to false-negative (131)I scanning results. The diagnostic and therapeutic delay is responsible for a poor prognosis in this subgroup of patients. Efforts have been made in the search for suitable imaging modalities capable of early detection of recurrent thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: The authors prospectively analyzed 24 patients with WDTC, negative results of whole-body (131)I scintigraphy, and elevated serum thyroglobulin concentrations. Attenuation-corrected whole-body FDG-PET scans from the neck to the upper legs were performed. In addition, all patients underwent cervical ultrasonography. The results of the imaging studies were compared with histopathologic findings. If no resection of the suspicious lesion was carried out, computed tomography data were used as control criteria. RESULTS: Overall, FDG-PET disclosed 38 hot spots. The sensitivity of the method was 94.6%, but the specificity was lower (25.0%). The diagnostic accuracy was 87.8%. There were three false-positive results in two patients with benign cervical lymph nodes. In one patient with regional lymph node metastases in the neck, two false-negative results were obtained. Ultrasound classified both findings as malignant, however. Because of unexpected findings, FDG-PET suggested potential modification of the surgical management in nine patients. Distant metastases could be disclosed using FDG-PET in only three patients. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic tool in the follow-up of thyroidectomized patients with WDTC, negative (131)I scanning results, and abnormal serum thyroglobulin concentrations. The method detects metastatic disease in 94.6% of cases. PET results changed surgical tactics in a significant number of patients. Accurate staging of locoregional cancer recurrence in the neck may be consummately obtained by concomitant analysis of PET and ultrasound results.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to detect recurrent disease in the follow-up of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) who have negative diagnostic (131)I scans and abnormal thyroglobulin levels. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In general, patients with WDTC have an excellent long-term prognosis when appropriate surgical treatment and follow-up are carried out. After total thyroid ablation, whole-body (131)I scintigraphy and measurement of serum thyroglobulin are useful diagnostic tools to detect persistent or recurrent malignancy. In case of tumor dedifferentiation, decreased or lost iodine-accumulating ability may lead to false-negative (131)I scanning results. The diagnostic and therapeutic delay is responsible for a poor prognosis in this subgroup of patients. Efforts have been made in the search for suitable imaging modalities capable of early detection of recurrent thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: The authors prospectively analyzed 24 patients with WDTC, negative results of whole-body (131)I scintigraphy, and elevated serum thyroglobulin concentrations. Attenuation-corrected whole-body FDG-PET scans from the neck to the upper legs were performed. In addition, all patients underwent cervical ultrasonography. The results of the imaging studies were compared with histopathologic findings. If no resection of the suspicious lesion was carried out, computed tomography data were used as control criteria. RESULTS: Overall, FDG-PET disclosed 38 hot spots. The sensitivity of the method was 94.6%, but the specificity was lower (25.0%). The diagnostic accuracy was 87.8%. There were three false-positive results in two patients with benign cervical lymph nodes. In one patient with regional lymph node metastases in the neck, two false-negative results were obtained. Ultrasound classified both findings as malignant, however. Because of unexpected findings, FDG-PET suggested potential modification of the surgical management in nine patients. Distant metastases could be disclosed using FDG-PET in only three patients. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic tool in the follow-up of thyroidectomized patients with WDTC, negative (131)I scanning results, and abnormal serum thyroglobulin concentrations. The method detects metastatic disease in 94.6% of cases. PET results changed surgical tactics in a significant number of patients. Accurate staging of locoregional cancer recurrence in the neck may be consummately obtained by concomitant analysis of PET and ultrasound results.
Authors: F Grünwald; T Kälicke; U Feine; R Lietzenmayer; K Scheidhauer; M Dietlein; O Schober; H Lerch; K Brandt-Mainz; W Burchert; G Hiltermann; U Cremerius; H J Biersack Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 1999-12
Authors: K H Bohuslavizki; S Klutmann; S Kröger; U Sonnemann; R Buchert; J A Werner; J Mester; M Clausen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M H Schwarzbach; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; F Willeke; U Hinz; L G Strauss; Y M Zhang; G Mechtersheimer; N Attigah; T Lehnert; C Herfarth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: D M Rose; D Delbeke; R D Beauchamp; W C Chapman; M P Sandler; K W Sharp; W O Richards; J K Wright; M E Frexes; C W Pinson; S D Leach Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: R M Pieterman; J W van Putten; J J Meuzelaar; E L Mooyaart; W Vaalburg; G H Koëter; V Fidler; J Pruim; H J Groen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-07-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W Wang; S M Larson; M Fazzari; S K Tickoo; K Kolbert; G Sgouros; H Yeung; H Macapinlac; J Rosai; R J Robbins Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: T Lerut; P Flamen; N Ectors; E Van Cutsem; M Peeters; M Hiele; W De Wever; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; G Deneffe; D Van Raemdonck; L Mortelmans Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: B Gibelli; P Tredici; C De Cicco; L Bodei; M T Sandri; G Renne; R Bruschini; N Tradati Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: Fabio Pomerri; Anna Rita Cervino; Faise Al Bunni; Laura Evangelista; Pier Carlo Muzzio Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Margarida Rodrigues; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Maria Leimer; Shuren Li; Fritz Andreae; Peter Angelberger; Robert Dudczak; Irene Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-05-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Clive S Grant; Geoffrey B Thompson; David R Farley; Melanie L Richards; Brian P Mullan; Ian D Hay Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.352