Edward A Sasse1. 1. Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, 5000 W. National Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53295, USA. esasse@wi.rr.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In order to decide on the feasibility of screening for disease by laboratory testing, a number of assessments need to be made. The necessary procedures and statistical calculations are required for an objective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a laboratory test and of the potential for screening and of the data obtained from the screening. METHODS: The determination of reference intervals, is an essential first step in the evaluation of the performance of a laboratory test. The procedures and calculations are necessary for the determination of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic predictive value and receiver-operating characteristic curve of a test and their respective applications in laboratory screening for disease. The additional statistical tools include odds ratios and likelihood ratios for assessing the performance of a laboratory test. CONCLUSION: These tools are used in the development of an appropriate clinical decision limit in a defined population of subjects and under defined conditions for acceptable screening.
BACKGROUND: In order to decide on the feasibility of screening for disease by laboratory testing, a number of assessments need to be made. The necessary procedures and statistical calculations are required for an objective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a laboratory test and of the potential for screening and of the data obtained from the screening. METHODS: The determination of reference intervals, is an essential first step in the evaluation of the performance of a laboratory test. The procedures and calculations are necessary for the determination of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic predictive value and receiver-operating characteristic curve of a test and their respective applications in laboratory screening for disease. The additional statistical tools include odds ratios and likelihood ratios for assessing the performance of a laboratory test. CONCLUSION: These tools are used in the development of an appropriate clinical decision limit in a defined population of subjects and under defined conditions for acceptable screening.
Authors: Marc H Goldfinger; Gerard R Ridgway; Carlos Ferreira; Caitlin R Langford; Lin Cheng; Arina Kazimianec; Andrea Borghetto; Thomas G Wright; Gary Woodward; Neelam Hassanali; Rowan C Nicholls; Hayley Simpson; Tom Waddell; Siddarth Vikal; Marija Mavar; Soubera Rymell; Ioan Wigley; Jaco Jacobs; Matt Kelly; Rajarshi Banerjee; J Michael Brady Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-03-08 Impact factor: 4.813