Literature DB >> 11727388

Standardized patients' perceptions about their own health care.

P M Wallach1, M Elnick, B Bognar, R Kovach, M Papadakis, S Zucker, A Speer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been detailed descriptions on standardized patients (SP) programs' effects on students, curricula, and faculty, yet little attention has been paid to the consequences of participating on the SP's.
PURPOSE: This study explored the perceptions of SPs toward their own health care in the context of having served as SPs.
METHOD: All 180 SPs participating in Department of Medicine programs at 5 medical schools were surveyed. They completed the survey during SP activities, or it was mailed to them. SPs indicated their level of agreement or disagreement with 11 attitude statements related to their own health care after serving as an SP using a Likert scale, with 1 reflecting the most positive attitude and 5 the least positive.
RESULTS: Responses to the attitudinal questions were obtained from 164 SPs (91%). SPs perceived that because of their participation as SPs they had a better understanding about medical history taking and physical examinations (1.9 +/- 0.9), communicated more effectively with their health care provider (1.8 +/- 0.9), and were more comfortable with both health care visits and physical examinations (2.2 +/- 0.9). There were no significant differences in results based on gender, age, race, or school.
CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence of their participation, the SPs indicated a change in attitudes about their personal health care. They perceived improved understanding and ability to communicate and comfort with their own health care. Participation in SP programs seems to influence SPs by improving perceptions about their own health care interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11727388     DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1304_03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Training simulated patients: evaluation of a training approach using self-assessment and peer/tutor feedback to improve performance.

Authors:  Jennifer Perera; Joachim Perera; Juriah Abdullah; Nagarajah Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Effect of emotionally complex roles on HIV-related simulated patients.

Authors:  Ximena Triviño; Lilian Ferrer; Margarita Bernales; Rosina Cianelli; Philippa Moore; Nilda Peragallo
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2013

4.  Working as simulated patient has effects on real patient life - Preliminary insights from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Simmenroth-Nayda; Gabriella Marx; Thorsten Lorkowski; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-17

5.  Transforming the Patient Role to Achieve Better Outcomes Through a Patient Empowerment Program: A Randomized Wait-List Control Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Altshuler; Joseph Plaksin; Sondra Zabar; Andrew Wallach; Chester Sawicki; Sarita Kundrod; Adina Kalet
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-04-21

6.  Blurred boundaries: sexuality and power in standardised patients' negotiations of the physical examination.

Authors:  Grainne P Kearney; Gerard J Gormley; Diane Wilson; Jennifer L Johnston
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.