INTRODUCTION: Carotid cavernous fistulas are abnormal communications between the cavernous sinus and the internal and/or external carotid artery. They may be spontaneous or acquired. Two basic types are distinguished as a function of the aetiology, clinical features and treatment. The direct type is usually due to trauma while the indirect is of varied aetiology. CLINICAL CASE: We present a series of seven cases of direct carotid-cavernous fistulas, four post-traumatic and three spontaneous, with initial symptoms of ocular involvement and ophthalmoparesia predominantly. All were treated, in our hospital, by embolization with a detachable balloon in the venous variant of the fistula in six cases and by carotid occlusion in one case. Only one severe complication due to distal embolization occurred. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to consider the diagnosis of carotid-cavernous fistulas in patients complaining of acute alterations of ocular motility, headache and/or other ocular symptoms, especially when there is a clinical history of head injury. There should be minimal delay between diagnosis and treatment since there is a high risk of hemorrhage and irreversible sequelae caused by alteration of the venous drainage when they are long-standing. The treatment of choice for direct fistulas is by detachable balloon, which has been shown to be superior to other techniques.
INTRODUCTION: Carotid cavernous fistulas are abnormal communications between the cavernous sinus and the internal and/or external carotid artery. They may be spontaneous or acquired. Two basic types are distinguished as a function of the aetiology, clinical features and treatment. The direct type is usually due to trauma while the indirect is of varied aetiology. CLINICAL CASE: We present a series of seven cases of direct carotid-cavernous fistulas, four post-traumatic and three spontaneous, with initial symptoms of ocular involvement and ophthalmoparesia predominantly. All were treated, in our hospital, by embolization with a detachable balloon in the venous variant of the fistula in six cases and by carotid occlusion in one case. Only one severe complication due to distal embolization occurred. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to consider the diagnosis of carotid-cavernous fistulas in patients complaining of acute alterations of ocular motility, headache and/or other ocular symptoms, especially when there is a clinical history of head injury. There should be minimal delay between diagnosis and treatment since there is a high risk of hemorrhage and irreversible sequelae caused by alteration of the venous drainage when they are long-standing. The treatment of choice for direct fistulas is by detachable balloon, which has been shown to be superior to other techniques.