Literature DB >> 11726240

Cerebellar substrates for error correction in motor conditioning.

M A Gluck1, M T Allen, C E Myers, R F Thompson.   

Abstract

The authors evaluate a mapping of Rescorla and Wagner's (1972) behavioral model of classical conditioning onto the cerebellar substrates for motor reflex learning and illustrate how the limitations of the Rescorla-Wagner model are just as useful as its successes for guiding the development of new psychobiological theories of learning. They postulate that the inhibitory pathway that returns conditioned response information from the cerebellar interpositus nucleus back to the inferior olive is the neural basis for the error correction learning proposed by Rescorla and Wagner (Gluck, Myers, & Thompson, 1994; Thompson, 1986). The authors' cerebellar model expects that behavioral processes described by the Rescorla-Wagner model will be localized within the cerebellum and related brain stem structures, whereas behavioral processes beyond the scope of the Rescorla-Wagner model will depend on extracerebellar structures such as the hippocampus and related cortical regions. Simulations presented here support both implications. Several novel implications of the authors' cerebellar error-correcting model are described including a recent empirical study by Kim, Krupa, and Thompson (1998), who verified that suppressing the putative error correction pathway should interfere with the Kamin (1969) blocking effect, a behavioral manifestation of error correction learning. The authors also discuss the model's implications for understanding the limits of cerebellar contributions to associative learning and how this informs our understanding of hippocampal function in conditioning. This leads to a more integrative view of the neural substrates of conditioning in which the authors' real-time circuit-level model of the cerebellum can be viewed as a generalization of the long-term memory module of Gluck and Myers' (1993) trial-level theory of cerebellar-hippocampal interaction in motor conditioning. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11726240     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  10 in total

1.  Selective hippocampal lesions disrupt a novel cue effect but fail to eliminate blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate extinction of pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Gavan P McNally; Michael Pigg; Gabrielle Weidemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Brain mechanisms for the formation of new movements during learning: the evolution of classical concepts.

Authors:  M E Ioffe
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01

4.  Chaos may enhance information transmission in the inferior olive.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Kenji Doya; Hidekazu Fukai; Jean Vianney Chiron; Tetsuya Furukawa; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The cerebellum is involved in reward-based reversal learning.

Authors:  Patrizia Thoma; Christian Bellebaum; Benno Koch; Michael Schwarz; Irene Daum
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  The role of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus in short and long term memory for trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Narawut Pakaprot; Soyun Kim; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning is not due to learned inattention: indirect support for an error correction mechanism of blocking.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

8.  Simultaneous processing of information on multiple errors in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Shoko Kasuga; Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Avoidance prone individuals self reporting behavioral inhibition exhibit facilitated acquisition and altered extinction of conditioned eyeblinks with partial reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  Michael Todd Allen; Catherine E Myers; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  SSCC TD: a serial and simultaneous configural-cue compound stimuli representation for temporal difference learning.

Authors:  Esther Mondragón; Jonathan Gray; Eduardo Alonso; Charlotte Bonardi; Dómhnall J Jennings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.