Literature DB >> 11725344

The usefulness of cytogenetic biomarkers as intermediate endpoints in carcinogenesis.

L Hagmar1, U Strömberg, H Tinnerberg, Z Mikoczy.   

Abstract

During the last decades, cytogenetic biomarkers in peripheral lymphocytes have been used to assess exposure to carcinogenic or mutagenic agents in occupational settings. The first method in use assessed chromosomal aberrations (CA). It is generally accepted that chromosomal mutations are causal events in the development of neoplasia, and it has earlier been postulated, but not proven, that increased chromosomal damage may reflect an enhanced cancer risk. Two less laborious techniques, sister chromatoid exchanges (SCE) and micronuclei (MN), were introduced later-on in occupational health surveillances. SCE represent symmetrical exchanges between sister chromatids; generally they do not result in alteration of the chromosome morphology. MN represent small, additional nuclei formed by the exclusion of chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes lagging at mitosis. MN rates therefore indirectly reflect chromosome breakage or impairment of the mitotic apparatus. The health significance of increased levels of SCE and MN is poorly understood. The usefulness of these cytogenetic techniques for implementing preventive measures in the workplaces depend on how well they serve as biomarkers of exposure but also on whether they can predict cancer risk or not. Recently performed epidemiological studies show that the CA frequency predicts the overall cancer risk in healthy subjects. Such associations could not been seen for SCE or MN. Age, sex, or time since test did not affect the predictive value of CA. This predictivity was seen irrespective of whether the subjects had been smokers or occupationally exposed to carcinogenic agents. Risk factors such as age, smoking and occupational exposures usually explain only some of the interindividual variation in CA frequency. It seems reasonable that not yet identified individual susceptibility factors explain a large fraction of the interindividual CA variation and also the cancer predictivity of the CA biomarker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11725344     DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Evaluating the potential genotoxicity of phthalates esters (PAEs) in perfumes using in vitro assays.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Tahreer Al-Rajudi; Ghofran Al-Qudaihi; Pulicat Manogaran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Association between urinary 1-hydroxypyrene and genotoxic effects in coke oven workers.

Authors:  E Siwińska; D Mielzyńska; L Kapka
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Studying health outcomes in farmworker populations exposed to pesticides.

Authors:  Linda A McCauley; W Kent Anger; Matthew Keifer; Rick Langley; Mark G Robson; Diane Rohlman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  On the need for the development of a cancer early detection, diagnostic, prognosis, and treatment response system.

Authors:  Tobore Onojighofia Tobore
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2019-11-29

6.  Iron(III)-Quercetin Complexes' Safety for MRI Cell Tracking in Cell Therapy Applications: Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Assessment.

Authors:  Nathupakorn Dechsupa; Panida Kosintarajit; Kanyapak Kamkan; Thanyalak Khanjina; Chonticha Sirikul; Phattarawadee Innuan; Authaphinya Suwan; Nampeung Anukul; Jiraporn Kantapan
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Micronuclei in genotoxicity assessment: from genetics to epigenetics and beyond.

Authors:  Lidiya Luzhna; Palak Kathiria; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.