Literature DB >> 11724048

Resident interpretation of emergency CT scans in the evaluation of acute appendicitis.

M C Albano1, G W Ross, J J Ditchek, G L Duke, S Teeger, H D Sostman, N Flomenbaum, C Seifert, P W Brill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiology resident interpretation of computed tomographic (CT) scans at academic institutions often guides management of cases of suspected acute appendicitis in the emergency department. The purpose of this study was to compare resident and faculty interpretation of CT scans obtained for acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 16, 1999, to July 13, 2000, CT was performed in 103 consecutive patients between the hours of 9:00 PM and 8:00 AM who were suspected of having acute appendicitis. The authors compared the residents' preliminary written interpretations with both the final reports written by the faculty and the surgical findings. The faculty interpreting the CT scans were aware of resident interpretations but were not aware that a study was being conducted.
RESULTS: The final faculty interpretation and the preliminary resident interpretation were identical in 96 of the 103 patients (93%; 95% confidence interval: 87.8%, 97.2%). In only one patient was a scan originally interpreted as negative interpreted as positive by the faculty member. Clinically, the patient did not have acute appendicitis, and surgery was not perforrmed.
CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, image interpretations made by adequately trained radiology residents can be expected to closely match those of the radiology faculty, and the practice of after-hours interpretation of such studies by radiology residents is safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11724048     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80772-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  6 in total

1.  Handheld device review of abdominal CT for the evaluation of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Asim F Choudhri; Thomas M Carr; Christopher P Ho; James R Stone; Spencer B Gay; Drew L Lambert
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training.

Authors:  Andrew Slater; Stuart A Taylor; Emily Tam; Louise Gartner; Julia Scarth; Chand Peiris; Arun Gupta; Michele Marshall; David Burling; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff.

Authors:  Jessica Walls; Natalie Hunter; Penelope M A Brasher; Stephen G F Ho
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29

4.  Added value of coronal reformations for duty radiologists and for referring physicians or surgeons in the CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim; Seokyung Hahn; Kyung Won Lee; Hak Jong Lee; Tae Jung Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Joong Ho Shin; Byung Joo Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013).

Authors:  Youn Joo Lee; So Young Choi; Kyu Sun Kim; Po Song Yang
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 0.212

6.  Diagnostic Efficiency of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Clinically Equivocal Cases of Acute Appendicitis with Surgical Correlation.

Authors:  Jawaid Iqbal; Raza Sayani; Misbah Tahir; Syed M Mustahsan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.