Literature DB >> 11721911

Fractionation of isotopically labeled peptides in quantitative proteomics.

R Zhang1, C S Sioma, S Wang, F E Regnier.   

Abstract

The goal of quantitative proteomics is to examine the expression levels of all of the proteins in a biological system and recognize those that change as a function of some stimulus. Quantification is now frequently based on derivatization of peptides with isotopically distinguishable labeling agents. This study examines the extent to which isotopic forms of peptides having the same amino acid sequence are resolved by reversed-phase chromatography and assesses the degree to which resolution of these isotopically different forms of a peptide impact quantification. Three derivatizing agents were examined, the do and d3 forms of N-acetoxysuccinimide, the do and d4 forms of succinic anhydride, and the do and d8 forms of the commercial ICAT reagent Peptide mixtures from control and experimental samples were derivatized individually, mixed, subjected to reversed-phase chromatography, and analyzed by ESI-MS. When partial resolution of the isotopic forms of a peptide occurs, the largest error in assessing the true isotope ratio in a sample occurs when sampling at the extremes of a peak. Early in the elution of a peak, the sample will be enriched in the deuterated species, whereas the opposite is true at the tailing edge of a peak. Acetylated peptides showed the lowest degree of separation. Resolution of the deuterated and nondeuterated forms in this case was 0.023. This amounts to slightly over a 1-s difference in their peak maxima and can cause a typical error of +/- 6% at the leading and tailing edges of a peak. In contrast, resolution of the deuterated and nondeuterated forms of the ICAT reagent were calculated to be 0.45. This means that in a peak of 1-min width (W1/2), the peak maxima will vary by approximately 30 s, and measurement errors of -83 and +500% can occur at the leading and tailing edges of a peak. It is concluded that resolution of isotopic forms of a peptide can cause substantial quantification errors in quantitative proteomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11721911     DOI: 10.1021/ac010583a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  49 in total

Review 1.  Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective.

Authors:  Parag Mallick; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  An automated method for the analysis of stable isotope labeling data in proteomics.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Wade Hines; Jiri Adamec; John M Asara; Stephen Naylor; Fred E Regnier
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Proteomic analysis of reporter genes for molecular imaging of transplanted embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Joseph C Wu; Feng Cao; Sucharita Dutta; Xiaoyan Xie; Elmer Kim; Neil Chungfat; Sanjiv Gambhir; Sean Mathewson; Andrew J Connolly; Matthew Brown; Evelyn W Wang
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Investigating quantitation of phosphorylation using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Laurie Parker; Aaron Engel-Hall; Kevin Drew; George Steinhardt; Donald L Helseth; David Jabon; Timothy McMurry; David S Angulo; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.982

Review 5.  Applications of quantitative pharmacodynamic effect markers in drug target identification and therapy development.

Authors:  Robert M Straubinger; Wojciech Krzyzanski; Crystal M Francoforte; Jun Qu
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  SLP-65 phosphorylation dynamics reveals a functional basis for signal integration by receptor-proximal adaptor proteins.

Authors:  Thomas Oellerich; Mads Grønborg; Konstantin Neumann; He-Hsuan Hsiao; Henning Urlaub; Jürgen Wienands
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Isotope-coded dimethyl tagging for differential quantification of posttranslational protein carbonylation by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, an end-product of lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  Navin Rauniyar; Laszlo Prokai
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.982

Review 8.  Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Fang Xie; Tao Liu; Wei-Jun Qian; Vladislav A Petyuk; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Quantitative neuroproteomics of the synapse.

Authors:  Dinah Lee Ramos-Ortolaza; Ittai Bushlin; Noura Abul-Husn; Suresh P Annangudi; Jonathan Sweedler; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

10.  A comparative 'bottom up' proteomics strategy for the site-specific identification and quantification of protein modifications by electrophilic lipids.

Authors:  Bingnan Han; Michael Hare; Samanthi Wickramasekara; Yi Fang; Claudia S Maier
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.