Literature DB >> 11720916

Impact of the internet on primary care staff in Glasgow.

S M Wilson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Government has invested pound 7 million (approx. $11.5 million) to connect all Primary Care Practices in Scotland to the National Health Service Intranet (NHSnet). This provides General Practitioners (GPs) and Practice Nurses with access to the Internet and a wealth of healthcare information of varying quality.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines Primary Care Staff's use of the Internet, their views on the reliability of healthcare information available via the Internet, and their interaction with patients who have presented them with information downloaded from the Internet.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire was distributed to a random sample of 300 GPs and 130 Practice Nurses throughout Glasgow. There was a response rate of 60%.
RESULTS: Time restraints (20%) and concerns that they lack the necessary skills (17%) were highlighted as the most common reasons for not accessing the Internet. Sixty-nine per cent of GPs and 70% of Practice Nurses had looked at the Internet for healthcare information. Forty-eight per cent of GPs and 41% of Practice Nurses were concerned about the reliability of Internet information. Fifty-eight per cent of GPs and 34% of Practice Nurses have been approached by patients with Internet healthcare information. Sixty-five per cent of the information presented by patients was new to GPs.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Primary Care Staff now have access to the Internet and use it to look up healthcare information. Almost half of GPs would consider referring their patients to the Internet for further information about their condition. Results highlight that the healthcare information downloaded from the Internet by patients is accurate, but patients have problems correctly interpreting this information. An increase in the use of home computers and free access to the Internet will see a continued increase in patients approaching GPs and Practice Nurses with healthcare information downloaded from the Internet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11720916      PMCID: PMC1761708          DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1.2.e7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  6 in total

Review 1.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.

Authors:  P Kim; T R Eng; M J Deering; A Maxfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

2.  Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home.

Authors:  P Impicciatore; C Pandolfini; N Casella; M Bonati
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-28

3.  Evidence based patient information. is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

4.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.

Authors:  W M Silberg; G D Lundberg; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  General practitioners' use of computers during the consultation.

Authors:  C Watkins; I Harvey; C Langley; A Faulkner; S Gray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  General practitioners' use of evidence databases.

Authors:  J M Young; J E Ward
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-01-18       Impact factor: 7.738

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  From patients to end users.

Authors:  Tom Ferguson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

2.  Just how demanding can we get before we blow it?

Authors:  Hilda Bastian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-14

Review 3.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review.

Authors:  Herma C H Coumou; Frans J Meijman
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-01

Review 4.  The internet's role in HPV vaccine education.

Authors:  Pooja R Patel; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The National Health Service and the internet.

Authors:  Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 6.  A guide to creating your own patient-oriented website.

Authors:  W A Clement; S Wilson; Brian J Bingham
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 18.000

7.  Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey.

Authors:  Silvina Santana; Berthold Lausen; Maria Bujnowska-Fedak; Catherine E Chronaki; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Rolf Wynn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Survey of doctors' experience of patients using the Internet.

Authors:  Henry W W Potts; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why?

Authors:  John Powell; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age.

Authors:  G Eysenbach; A R Jadad
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.