Literature DB >> 11720354

Detector development for microPET II: a 1 microl resolution PET scanner for small animal imaging.

A Chatziioannou1, Y C Tai, N Doshi, S R Cherry.   

Abstract

We are currently developing a small animal positron emission tomography (PET) scanner with a design goal of 1 microlitre (1 mm3) image resolution. The detectors consist of a 12 x 12 array of 1 x 1 x 10 mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) scintillator crystals coupled to a 64-channel photomultiplier tube (PMT) via 5 cm long optical fibre bundles. The optical fibre connection allows a high detector packing fraction despite the dead space surrounding the active region of the PMT. Optical fibre bundles made from different types of glass were tested for light transmission, and also their effects on crystal identification and energy resolution, and compared to direct coupling of the LSO arrays to the PMTs. We also investigated the effects of extramural absorber (EMA) in the fibre bundles. Based on these results, fibre bundles manufactured from F2 glass were selected. We built three pairs of prototype detectors (directly coupled LSO array, fibre bundle without EMA and fibre bundle with EMA) and measured flood histograms, energy resolution, intrinsic spatial resolution and timing resolution. The results demonstrated an intrinsic spatial resolution (FWHM) of 1.12 mm (directly coupled), 1.23 mm (fibre bundle without EMA coupling) and 1.27 mm (fibre bundle with EMA coupling) using an approximately 500 microm diameter Na-22 point source. Using a 330 microm outer diameter steel needle line source filled with F-18, spatial resolution for the detector with the EMA optical fibre bundle improved to 1.05 mm. The respective timing and energy FWHM values were 1.96 ns, 21% (directly coupled), 2.20 ns, 23% (fibre bundle without EMA) and 2.99 ns, 30% (fibre bundle with EMA). The peak-to-valley ratio in the flood histograms was better with EMA (5:1) compared to the optical fibre bundle without EMA (2.5:1), due to the decreased optical cross-talk. In comparison to the detectors used in our current generation microPET scanner, these detectors substantially improve on the spatial resolution, preserve the timing resolution and provide adequate energy resolution for a modern high-resolution animal PET tomograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720354     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/11/310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

Review 1.  PET imaging in small animals.

Authors:  Heinrich R Schelbert; Masayuki Inubushi; Robert S Ross
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  From PET detectors to PET scanners.

Authors:  John L Humm; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Molecular imaging: a view from the inside.

Authors:  Harvey R Herschman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Novel Imaging Methods for Analysis of Tissue Resident Cells in HIV/SIV.

Authors:  Eirini Moysi; Jacob D Estes; Constantinos Petrovas
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 5.  Techniques for brain imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alloza; Brian J Bacskai
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 6.  Molecular cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Lawrence W Dobrucki; Albert J Sinusas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Instrumentation for molecular imaging in preclinical research: Micro-PET and Micro-SPECT.

Authors:  Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2005

Review 8.  Emerging imaging techniques.

Authors:  Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Detector Concept for OPET-A Combined PET and Optical Imaging System.

Authors:  D L Prout; R W Silverman; A Chatziioannou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Efficient preparation and biological evaluation of a novel multivalency bifunctional chelator for 64Cu radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Shuanglong Liu; Zibo Li; Li-Peng Yap; Chiun-Wei Huang; Ryan Park; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 5.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.