Literature DB >> 11720120

Individual differences in handedness and specific speech and language impairment: evidence against a genetic link.

D V Bishop1.   

Abstract

Data from two twin studies were used to address two related questions. First, is there any association between handedness and specific speech and language impairment (SSLI) in children? Second, is there genetic influence on individual differences in handedness and, if so, are the same genes implicated in the cause of SSLI? The first study used data from 58 MZ and 26 DZ pairs previously recruited for an investigation into the genetic origins of SSLI. All pairs contained at least one child with SSLI. Handedness was assessed using a preference inventory and a tapping task from which a laterality quotient (LQ) was derived. There were no handedness differences between these twins and 172 singleborn controls, and neither measure revealed any association between handedness and SSLI. The data were equally well-fitted by a CE model (no genetic influence) and an AE model (no effect of shared environment) for both hand preference and tapping LQ. Nonshared environment was the largest influence on handedness for both measures. Bivariate analysis indicated no overlapping genetic influences on SSLI and handedness. In the second study, handedness was assessed in a general population sample of 48 MZ and 44 DZ twin pairs, aged 7 to 13 years, using a preference inventory and a peg-moving task. A subset of children was also given a test that assessed persistence of hand preference when reaching across the midline. The latter was the only measure to relate to children's language status, with language-impaired children showing less midline crossing. This appears to reflect neurodevelopmental immaturity, rather than a stable trait. To investigate familial transmission of handedness, inventory data for parents and their twins were combined for both samples. The most parsimonious model was one that accounted for parent-child resemblance solely in terms of cultural transmission. Overall, there was no evidence that genes play a role in determining stable individual differences in hand preference. Insofar as there are links between handedness and speech and language difficulties, these reflect delayed neuromotor maturation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720120     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012239617367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  13 in total

1.  Confirmatory evidence for linkage of relative hand skill to 2p12-q11.

Authors:  Clyde Francks; Lynn E DeLisi; Simon E Fisher; Steve H Laval; Judith E Rue; John F Stein; Anthony P Monaco
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Lateral preference in Williams-Beuren syndrome is associated with cognition and language.

Authors:  D Pérez-García; R Flores; C Brun-Gasca; L A Pérez-Jurado
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Genetic covariation underlying reading, language and related measures in a sample selected for specific language impairment.

Authors:  Jessica Logan; Stephen A Petrill; Judy Flax; Laura M Justice; Liping Hou; Anne S Bassett; Paula Tallal; Linda M Brzustowicz; Christopher W Bartlett
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Nongenetic factors associated with human handedness and footedness in Japanese twin children.

Authors:  Syuichi Ooki
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Human handedness and scalp hair-whorl direction develop from a common genetic mechanism.

Authors:  Amar J S Klar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Epigenesis of behavioural lateralization in humans and other animals.

Authors:  S M Schaafsma; B J Riedstra; K A Pfannkuche; A Bouma; T G G Groothuis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Associations between handedness and cerebral lateralisation for language: a comparison of three measures in children.

Authors:  Margriet A Groen; Andrew J O Whitehouse; Nicholas A Badcock; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fine motor deficits in reading disability and language impairment: same or different?

Authors:  Annie Brookman; Sarah McDonald; David McDonald; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  No population bias to left-hemisphere language in 4-year-olds with language impairment.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Georgina Holt; Andrew J O Whitehouse; Margriet Groen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Resounding failure to replicate links between developmental language disorder and cerebral lateralisation.

Authors:  Alexander C Wilson; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.