Literature DB >> 11719852

Reversible electropermeabilization of mammalian cells by high-intensity, ultra-short pulses of submicrosecond duration.

K J Müller1, V L Sukhorukov, U Zimmermann.   

Abstract

Mouse myeloma cells were electropermeabilized by single square-wave electric pulses with amplitudes of up to approximately 150 kV/cm and durations of 10-100 nsec. The effects of the field intensity, pulse duration and medium conductivity on cell viability and field-induced uptake of molecules were analyzed by quantitative flow cytometry using the membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye propidium iodide as indicator molecule. Despite the extremely large field strengths, the majority of cells survived the exposure to ultra-short field pulses. The electrically induced dye uptake increased markedly with decreasing conductivity of the suspending medium. We assigned this phenomenon to the transient electrodeformation (stretching) force that assumes its maximum value if cells are suspended in low-conductivity media, i.e., if the external conductivity sigmae is smaller than that of the cytosol sigmai. The stretching force vanishes when sigmae is equal to or larger than sigmai. Due to their capability of delivering extremely large electric fields, the pulse power systems used here appear to be a promising tool for the electropermeabilization of very small cells and vesicles (including intracellular organelles, liposomes, etc.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11719852     DOI: 10.1007/s00232-001-0084-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  24 in total

1.  The effects of intense submicrosecond electrical pulses on cells.

Authors:  Jingdong Deng; Karl H Schoenbach; E Stephen Buescher; Pamela S Hair; Paula M Fox; Stephen J Beebe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Use of collagen gel as a three-dimensional in vitro model to study electropermeabilization and gene electrotransfer.

Authors:  Sasa Haberl; Mojca Pavlin
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparison following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses.

Authors:  Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-20

4.  Quantification of electroporative uptake kinetics and electric field heterogeneity effects in cells.

Authors:  S M Kennedy; Z Ji; J C Hedstrom; J H Booske; S C Hagness
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Effects of extracellular calcium on cell membrane resealing in sonoporation.

Authors:  Yun Zhou; Jingyi Shi; Jianmin Cui; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Nanosecond electroporation: another look.

Authors:  Raji Sundararajan
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Scaling relationship and optimization of double-pulse electroporation.

Authors:  Mohamed M Sadik; Miao Yu; Mingde Zheng; Jeffrey D Zahn; Jerry W Shan; David I Shreiber; Hao Lin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

9.  Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Raminta Rodaitė-Riševičienė; Gintautas Saulis; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  Electroporating fields target oxidatively damaged areas in the cell membrane.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Zachary A Levine; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Vanessa Joubert; Matthew J Ziegler; Lluis M Mir; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.